Heart rate variability in myocardial infarction and heart failure

被引:130
作者
Chattipakorn, Nipon [1 ]
Incharoen, Tanat
Kanlop, Natnicha
Chattipakorn, Siriporn
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Cardiac Electrophysiol Res & Training Ctr, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Cardiac Electrophysiol Unit, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
heart rate variability; myocardial infarction; heart failure; arrhythmia; implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.221
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The need to refine the identification of patients who might benefit from implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator has been risen by the results of many clinical trials on ICD therapy. Traditional parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction and the presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were not strong enough to achieve this goal with reasonable cost-effectiveness. Heart rate variability (HRV) is one of the most popular parameters used to assess the autonomic tone. HRV has been reported as a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Currently, three different categories of methods in HRV analysis are being used; the time domain, frequency domain, and non-linear dynamic analysis. Both time domain and frequency domain analyses of HRV have been investigated extensively regarding their use as a prognostic marker for cardiovascular mortality. The non-linear dynamic analysis is the latest tool that has shown to have an even higher predictive value than any of the traditional parameters. However, standardized and supporting evidence on this new technique is still lacking. In this article, the current role of HRV in the prediction of cardiovascular mortality in myocardial infarction and heart failure patients has been reviewed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
[31]   Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction [J].
Hohnloser, SH ;
Kuck, KH ;
Dorian, P ;
Roberts, RS ;
Hampton, JR ;
Hatala, R ;
Fain, E ;
Gent, M ;
Connolly, SJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (24) :2481-2488
[32]  
HON EH, 1963, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V87, P814
[33]   Fractal correlation properties of R-R interval dynamics and mortality in patients with depressed left ventricular function after an acute myocardial infarction [J].
Huikuri, HV ;
Mäkikallio, TH ;
Peng, CK ;
Goldberger, AL ;
Hintze, U ;
Moller, M .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (01) :47-53
[34]   Role of electrophysiologic studies, signal-averaged electrocardiography, heart rate variability, T-wave alternans, and loop recorders for risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias [J].
Iravanian, S ;
Arshad, A ;
Steinberg, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 14 (01) :16-19
[35]  
JensenUrstad K, 1997, SCAND J MED SCI SPOR, V7, P274
[36]   Heart rate variability in adult patients with isolated left ventricular noncompaction [J].
Kawasaki, T ;
Azuma, A ;
Taniguchi, T ;
Asada, S ;
Kamitani, T ;
Kawasaki, S ;
Matsubara, H ;
Sugihara, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (01) :147-150
[37]   Presentation of autonomic function following successful reperfusion with Streptokinase within 12 hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction [J].
Kelly, PA ;
Nolan, J ;
Wilson, JI ;
Perrins, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (02) :203-+
[38]   DECREASED HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH INCREASED MORTALITY AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
KLEIGER, RE ;
MILLER, JP ;
BIGGER, JT ;
MOSS, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 59 (04) :256-262
[39]   The MUSTT study: Evaluating testing and treatment [J].
Klein, HU ;
Reek, S .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 4 (Suppl 1) :45-50
[40]   Quantitative assessment of microvolt T-wave alternans in patients with congestive heart failure [J].
Klingenheben, T ;
Ptaszynski, P ;
Hohnloser, SH .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (06) :620-624