Communicative dimensions of pain catastrophizing: social cueing effects on pain behaviour and coping

被引:161
作者
Sullivan, MJL
Adams, H
Sullivan, ME
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Fenwick Psychol & Hlth Consultants, Halifax, NS, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
pain catastrophizing; pain behaviour; coping; social context;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2003.11.003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The study was designed to assess whether the social context of a pain experience impacted on the relation between catastrophizing and duration of pain behaviour. Based on a communal coping model, the prediction was that the presence of an observer during a pain procedure would differentially influence the display of pain behaviour in high and low catastrophizers. University undergraduates taking part in a cold pressor procedure were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) participant alone (n = 30), or (2) observer present (n = 34). Analysis of video records revealed that high pain catastrophizers displayed communicative pain behaviours (e.g. facial displays, vocalizations) for a longer duration when an observer was present compared to high pain catastrophizers who were alone during the pain procedure. The duration of pain management behaviours (e.g. holding, rubbing) did not vary significantly as a function of catastrophizing. When the observer was present, high catastrophizers also reported using fewer cognitive coping strategies than low catastrophizers. The pattern of findings suggests that in the presence of an observer, high pain catastrophizers show a propensity to engage in strategies that more effectively communicate their pain, and are less likely to engage in strategies that might minimize pain. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed. (C) 2003 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   A theoretical framework for understanding self-report and observational measures of pain: a communications model [J].
Hadjistavropoulos, T ;
Craig, KD .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2002, 40 (05) :551-570
[12]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT COPING STRATEGIES FOR PAIN [J].
HEYNEMAN, NE ;
FREMOUW, WJ ;
GANO, D ;
KIRKLAND, F ;
HEIDEN, L .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1990, 14 (01) :63-77
[13]   Pain coping strategies that predict patients' and spouses' ratings of patients' self-efficacy [J].
Keefe, FJ ;
KashikarZuck, S ;
Robinson, E ;
Salley, S ;
Beaupre, P ;
Caldwell, D ;
Baucom, D ;
Haythornthwaite, J .
PAIN, 1997, 73 (02) :191-199
[14]   COPING WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PAIN - CATASTROPHIZING AS A MALADAPTIVE STRATEGY [J].
KEEFE, FJ ;
BROWN, GK ;
WALLSTON, KA ;
CALDWELL, DS .
PAIN, 1989, 37 (01) :51-56
[15]   The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of catastrophizing [J].
Keefe, FJ ;
Lefebvre, JC ;
Egert, JR ;
Affleck, G ;
Sullivan, MJ ;
Caldwell, DS .
PAIN, 2000, 87 (03) :325-334
[16]   PAIN COPING STRATEGIES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS PATIENTS [J].
KEEFE, FJ ;
CALDWELL, DS ;
QUEEN, KT ;
GIL, KM ;
MARTINEZ, S ;
CRISSON, JE ;
OGDEN, W ;
NUNLEY, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 55 (02) :208-212
[17]   DEVELOPMENT OF AN OBSERVATION METHOD FOR ASSESSING PAIN BEHAVIOR IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENTS [J].
KEEFE, FJ ;
BLOCK, AR .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1982, 13 (04) :363-375
[18]   The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Further psychometric evaluation with adult samples [J].
Osman, A ;
Barrios, FX ;
Gutierrez, PM ;
Kopper, BA ;
Merrifield, T ;
Grittmann, L .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 23 (04) :351-365
[19]   THE EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED VERSUS ENACTED SOCIAL SUPPORT ON THE DISCRIMINATIVE CUE FUNCTION OF SPOUSES FOR PAIN BEHAVIORS [J].
PAULSEN, JS ;
ALTMAIER, EM .
PAIN, 1995, 60 (01) :103-110
[20]   PAIN BEHAVIOR IS NOT UNITARY [J].
PRKACHIN, KM .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1986, 9 (04) :754-755