Pharmacological rationale for the treatment of chronic urticaria with second-generation non-sedating antihistamines at higher-than-standard doses

被引:20
作者
Zuberbier, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Dermatol & Allergy, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC URTICARIA; SERUM SKIN-TEST; DOUBLE-BLIND; THERAPEUTIC ALTERNATIVES; P-GLYCOPROTEIN; PLACEBO; FEXOFENADINE; CETIRIZINE; DESLORATADINE; LEVOCETIRIZINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04185.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Chronic urticaria (CU) is a long-lasting and distressing condition that impairs patient quality of life (QoL) by disrupting sleep and diminishing work/school productivity. Thus treatment should not only be safe and effective but also not add to this impairment or increase risks to health or safety. Non-sedating second-generation antihistamines, with their long duration of action, pharmacodynamic properties that allow once-daily dosing and lack of drugdrug interactions and sedative effects, are the first-line symptomatic treatment option, but some patients have no adequate response to standard doses of these medications. Other therapeutic approaches to refractory urticaria have been suggested but have been limited by sparse clinical data and/or significant adverse effect profiles. Although discouraged by treatment guidelines, sedating antihistamines are frequently prescribed for nighttime use when urticaria symptoms are severe as add-on therapy to a non-sedating antihistamine. However, their pronounced effects on rapid eye movement sleep and hangover negatively impact QoL, learning and performance, and limit their use for patients in occupations that require alertness. For patients who do not respond adequately to standard doses of non-sedating second-generation antihistamines, increasing the dose of non-sedating antihistamines thus may represent the safest therapeutic approach. Given the fact that only few controlled studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of high-dose non-sedating antihistamines in CU, patient safety should be a key consideration when choosing a specific antihistamine.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 18
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[31]   An evaluation of the effects of high-dose fexofenadine on the central nervous system: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers [J].
Hindmarch, I ;
Shamsi, Z ;
Kimber, S .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2002, 32 (01) :133-139
[32]  
Jáuregui I, 2007, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V17, P41
[33]  
Juniper Elizabeth F, 2005, J Allergy Clin Immunol, V115, pS390, DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.014
[34]   Increasing the dose of cetirizine may lead to better control of chronic idiopathic urticaria: an open study of 21 patients [J].
Kameyoshi, Y. ;
Tanaka, T. ;
Mihara, S. ;
Takahagi, S. ;
Niimi, N. ;
Hide, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 157 (04) :803-804
[35]   Pathogenesis of chronic urticaria [J].
Kaplan, A. P. ;
Greaves, M. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (06) :777-787
[36]   Once-daily fexofenadine treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Kaplan, AP ;
Spector, SL ;
Meeves, S ;
Liao, YN ;
Varghese, ST ;
Georges, G .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 94 (06) :662-669
[37]   Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of loratadine with concomitant administration of ketoconazole or cimetidine [J].
Kosoglou, T ;
Salfi, M ;
Lim, JM ;
Batra, VK ;
Cayen, MN ;
Affrime, MB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 50 (06) :581-589
[38]   Chronic urticaria - Aetiology, management and current and future treatment options [J].
Kozel, MMA ;
Sabroe, RA .
DRUGS, 2004, 64 (22) :2515-2536
[39]   Effective treatment of therapy-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria with omalizumab [J].
Magerl, Markus ;
Staubach, Petra ;
Altrichter, Sabine ;
Ardelean, Elena ;
Krause, Karoline ;
Metz, Martin ;
Weller, Karsten ;
Maurer, Marcus .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 126 (03) :665-666
[40]  
MANESH PA, 2009, INDIAN J DERMATOL VE, V75, P187