Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment

被引:164
作者
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
Chang, Chih-Hung
Thissen, David
Reeve, Bryce B.
机构
[1] Qual Metr Inc, Lincoln, RI 02865 USA
[2] Hlth Assessment Lab, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Natl Canc Inst, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
computerized adaptive testing; health status indicators; questionnaires; algorithms; mental health; factor analysis; statistical;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Item banks and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) have the potential to greatly improve the assessment of health outcomes. This review describes the unique features of item banks and CAT and discusses how to develop item banks. In CAT, a computer selects the items from an item bank that are most relevant for and informative about the particular respondent; thus optimizing test relevance and precision. Item response theory (IRT) provides the foundation for selecting the items that are most informative for the particular respondent and for scoring responses on a common metric. The development of an item bank is a multi-stage process that requires a clear definition of the construct to be measured, good items, a careful psychometric analysis of the items, and a clear specification of the final CAT. The psychometric analysis needs to evaluate the assumptions of the IRT model such as unidimensionality and local independence; that the items function the same way in different subgroups of the population; and that there is an adequate fit between the data and the chosen item response models. Also, interpretation guidelines need to be established to help the clinical application of the assessment. Although medical research can draw upon expertise from educational testing in the development of item banks and CAT, the medical field also encounters unique opportunities and challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[2]  
Andrich D., 2011, Rasch models for measurement
[3]  
Andrich David, 2003, J Appl Meas, V4, P205
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PARSCALE IRT BASED T
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HDB MODERN ITEM RESP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PROBABILISTIC MODELS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MPLUS USERS GUIDE
[8]   A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey:: The headache impact test (HIT™) [J].
Bayliss, MS ;
Dewey, JE ;
Dunlap, I ;
Batenhorst, AS ;
Cady, R ;
Diamond, ML ;
Sheftell, F .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :953-961
[9]   PERFORMANCE OF A 5-ITEM MENTAL-HEALTH SCREENING-TEST [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
MURPHY, JM ;
GOLDMAN, PA ;
WARE, JE ;
BARSKY, AJ ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (02) :169-176
[10]   Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) to the metric of traditional headache scales [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kosinski, M ;
Ware, JE .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :981-1002