Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment

被引:164
作者
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
Chang, Chih-Hung
Thissen, David
Reeve, Bryce B.
机构
[1] Qual Metr Inc, Lincoln, RI 02865 USA
[2] Hlth Assessment Lab, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Natl Canc Inst, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
computerized adaptive testing; health status indicators; questionnaires; algorithms; mental health; factor analysis; statistical;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Item banks and Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) have the potential to greatly improve the assessment of health outcomes. This review describes the unique features of item banks and CAT and discusses how to develop item banks. In CAT, a computer selects the items from an item bank that are most relevant for and informative about the particular respondent; thus optimizing test relevance and precision. Item response theory (IRT) provides the foundation for selecting the items that are most informative for the particular respondent and for scoring responses on a common metric. The development of an item bank is a multi-stage process that requires a clear definition of the construct to be measured, good items, a careful psychometric analysis of the items, and a clear specification of the final CAT. The psychometric analysis needs to evaluate the assumptions of the IRT model such as unidimensionality and local independence; that the items function the same way in different subgroups of the population; and that there is an adequate fit between the data and the chosen item response models. Also, interpretation guidelines need to be established to help the clinical application of the assessment. Although medical research can draw upon expertise from educational testing in the development of item banks and CAT, the medical field also encounters unique opportunities and challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[31]   A RASCH MODEL FOR PARTIAL CREDIT SCORING [J].
MASTERS, GN .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1982, 47 (02) :149-174
[32]   DISTINGUISHING AMONG PARAMETRIC ITEM RESPONSE MODELS FOR POLYCHOTOMOUS ORDERED DATA [J].
MAYDEUOLIVARES, A ;
DRASGOW, F ;
MEAD, AD .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1994, 18 (03) :245-256
[33]   COMPARISONS OF THE COSTS AND QUALITY OF NORMS FOR THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY COLLECTED BY MAIL VERSUS TELEPHONE INTERVIEW - RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
KOSINSKI, M ;
WARE, JE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (06) :551-567
[34]   CONCEPTUAL NOTES ON MODELS FOR DISCRETE POLYTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSES [J].
MELLENBERGH, GJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1995, 19 (01) :91-100
[35]  
MOLENAAR IW, 1995, RASCH MODELS, P39
[36]   INFORMATION FUNCTIONS OF THE GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL [J].
MURAKI, E .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 17 (04) :351-363
[37]   A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
MURAKI, E .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1992, 16 (02) :159-176
[38]   FULL-INFORMATION FACTOR-ANALYSIS FOR POLYTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSES [J].
MURAKI, E ;
CARLSON, JE .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1995, 19 (01) :73-90
[39]  
Muraki E., 1997, Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, P153, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_9
[40]  
Muthen BO, 1984, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V29, P177