Hegemony, Institutionalism and US Foreign Policy: theory and practice in comparative historical perspective

被引:22
作者
Beeson, M
Higgott, R
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Polit Sci & Int Studies, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Warwick, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01436590500235777
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper explores the theoretical and policy implications of contemporary American hegemony. A key argument is that the development of US hegemony generally, and the distinctive turn in US foreign policy that has occurred in the wake of 11 September in particular, can best be understood by placing recent events in a comparative and historical framework. The immediate post-World War II order laid the foundations of a highly institutionalised multilateral system that provided key benefits for a number of countries while simultaneously constraining and enhancing US power. An historical reading of US hegemony suggests that its recent unilateralism is undermining the foundations of its power and influence.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1188
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
Dodge T, 2003, SURVIVAL, V45, P103, DOI 10.1080/00396330312331343416
[22]  
EICHENGREEN B, 1994, MIGRATION: A CHALLENGE FOR EUROPE, P3
[23]  
GADDIS JL, 1997, WE NOW KNOW RETHINKI, P38
[24]  
Gaddis John Lewis, 1972, US ORIGINS COLD WAR, P31
[25]  
GOODMAN PS, 2003, WASHINGTON POST 0725, pE1
[26]  
HASSNER P, WASHINGTON MONDE DIL
[27]   Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism [J].
Hemmer, C ;
Katzenstein, PJ .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2002, 56 (03) :575-+
[28]   After neoliberal globalization - The "securitization" of US foreign economic policy in East Asia [J].
Higgott, R .
CRITICAL ASIAN STUDIES, 2004, 36 (03) :425-444
[29]  
HIGGOTT R, 2004, TASK FORC GLOB GOV I
[30]  
Higgott R., 2004, International Politics, V41, P147