Soft Instruments, Few Networks: How 'New Governance' Materializes in Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe

被引:25
作者
Steurer, Reinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, InFER, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
corporate social responsibility (CSR); co-regulation; CSR policies; governing at arm's length; network governance; new governance; persuasion; public policies on CSR; regulation by information; soft regulation; VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL-PROGRAMS; GOVERNMENT; BUSINESS; STATE; CERTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; BUREAUCRACY; SALIENCE; CRITIQUE; MODES;
D O I
10.1002/eet.575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present paper explores how new governance materializes in public policies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) across Europe. By highlighting how both new governance and CSR facilitate the dispersion of public responsibilities to non-state actors, I first highlight the often overlooked complementarity of the two concepts. The paper then takes stock of how governments across Europe aim to shape and promote CSR by employing five different types of policy instruments. An analysis of empirical stocktaking in the light of the new governance theory confirms that public polices on CSR strongly resemble the new governance rationale, but not so much because of tangible networks employed but due to their voluntary character. The paper adds evidence to the growing body of literature showing that new governance is also concerned with influencing actors from a distance without actually being involved in networking activities, and without making use of their legislative power (also referred to as 'governing at arm's length'). Conclusions are drawn on the modes of governance and the role of persuasion in the context of new governance. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 290
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[61]   Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-governance school [J].
Marinetto, M .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2003, 51 (03) :592-608
[62]  
McCrudden Christopher., 2007, BUYING SOCIAL JUSTIC
[63]   Policy making and the role of government Realigning business, government and civil society [J].
Midttun, Atle .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 5 (03) :159-+
[64]   Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts [J].
Mitchell, RK ;
Agle, BR ;
Wood, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04) :853-886
[65]   The social responsibility of business and new governance [J].
Moon, J .
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2002, 37 (03) :385-408
[66]   The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development [J].
Moon, Jeremy .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 15 (05) :296-306
[67]  
Nelson J., 2004, The public role of private enterprise: Risks, opportunities and new models of engagement
[68]  
Rhodes R.A.W., 2000, DEBATING GOVERNANCE, P54
[69]   Old wine in new bottles? The Commission and the use of environmental policy instruments [J].
Rittberger, B ;
Richardson, J .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2003, 81 (03) :575-606
[70]   Business responses to environmental and social protection policies: toward a framework for analysis [J].
Rivera, Jorge ;
Oetzel, Jennifer ;
deLeon, Peter ;
Starik, Mark .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2009, 42 (01) :3-32