Lymphedema after breast cancer: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function

被引:323
作者
Hayes, Sandra C. [1 ]
Janda, Monika
Cornish, Bruce
Battistutta, Diana
Newman, Beth
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Phys & Chem Sci, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4899
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Secondary lymphedema is associated with adverse physical and psychosocial consequences among women with breast cancer (BC). This article describes the prevalence and incidence of lymphedema between 6 and 18 months after BC treatment; personal, treatment, and behavioral correlates of lymphedema status; and the presence of other upper-body symptoms (UBS) and function (UBF). Patients and Methods A population-based sample of Australian women (n = 287) with recently diagnosed, invasive BC were evaluated on five occasions using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Lymphedema was diagnosed when the ratio of impedance values, comparing treated and untreated sides, was three standard deviations more than normative data. UBF was assessed using the validated Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Results From 6 to 18 months after surgery, 33% (n = 62) of the sample were classified as having lymphedema; of these, 40% had long- term lymphedema. Although older age, more extensive surgery or axillary node dissection, and experiencing one or more treatment- related complication(s) or symptom(s) at baseline were associated with increased odds, lower socioeconomic status, having a partner, greater child care responsibilities, being treated on the dominant side, participation in regular activity, and having good UBF were associated with decreased odds of lymphedema. Not surprisingly, lymphedema leads to reduced UBF; however, BC survivors report high prevalences of other UBS (34% to 62%), irrespective of their lymphedema status. Conclusion Lymphedema is a public health issue deserving greater attention. More systematic surveillance for earlier detection and the potential benefits of physical activity to prevent lymphedema and mitigate symptoms warrant further clinical integration and research.
引用
收藏
页码:3536 / 3542
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Risk factors for developing upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment [J].
Arrault, Maria ;
Vignes, Stephane .
BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2006, 93 (10) :1001-1006
[2]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[3]  
*CDCP, 2001, BEHAV RISK FACT SURV
[4]   Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study [J].
Clark, B ;
Sitzia, J ;
Harlow, W .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 98 (05) :343-348
[5]   Quantification of lymphoedema using multi-frequency bioimpedance [J].
Cornish, BH ;
Ward, LC ;
Thomas, BJ ;
Bunce, IH .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1998, 49 (5-6) :651-652
[6]  
Cornish BH, 2001, LYMPHOLOGY, V34, P2
[7]   An audit of the incidence of arm lymphoedema after prophylactic level I/II axillary dissection without division of the pectoralis minor muscle [J].
della Rovere, GQ ;
Ahmad, I ;
Singh, P ;
Ashley, S ;
Daniels, IR ;
Mortimer, P .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (03) :158-161
[8]   Prevalence and aetiology of lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment in southern Tasmania [J].
Edwards, TL .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 70 (06) :412-418
[9]   Arm edema in breast cancer patients [J].
Erickson, VS ;
Pearson, ML ;
Ganz, PA ;
Adams, J ;
Kahn, KL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (02) :96-111
[10]  
Goffman Thomas E, 2004, Breast J, V10, P405, DOI 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21411.x