Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

被引：33

作者：

Lavender, T ^{[1
]}

Kingdon, C

Hart, A

Gyte, G

Gabbay, M

Neilson, JP

机构：

[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Dept Midwifery Studies, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England

[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Lancashire Sch Hlth & Post Grad Med, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England

[3] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Womens Hosp, Cochrane Pregnancy & Childbirth Grp, Liverpool L8 7SS, Merseyside, England

[4] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England

[5] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Womens Hosp, Sch Reprod & Dev Med, Liverpool L8 7SS, Merseyside, England

来源：

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 331卷 / 7515期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3A

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：490 / 491

页数：2

共 4 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2004, CAES SECT CLIN GUID

Ecker, JL .

[3] Elective primary cesarean delivery [J].

Minkoff, H ;

Chervenak, FA .

Weijer, C ;

Shapiro, SH ;

Glass, KC ;

Enkin, MW .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7263) :756-758