A Randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor

被引:79
作者
Benhamou, D [1 ]
Ghosh, C [1 ]
Mercier, FJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Antoine Beclere, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, Clamart, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200312000-00022
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background; This study was designed to determine and compare the minimum local analgesic concentrations of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine when used in epidural obstetric analgesia. Methods. In a double-blind study, healthy women requiring epidural analgesia for labor pain were randomized to receive either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. Drugs were administered as a 20-ml epidural bolus. The concentration of each started at 0.11% and increased or decreased at intervals of 0.01%, depending on the response of the previous patient, using the technique of up-down sequential allocation. Minimum local analgesic concentrations were calculated using the formula of Dixon and Massey. Efficacy was assessed using visual analog pain scores and motor and sensory block assessments, and safety was assessed by recording maternal and fetal/ neonate vital signs and adverse events. Results. Forty-seven patients received levobupivacaine, and 47 received ropivacaine. Minimum local analgesic concentrations for levobupivacaine (0.077%; 95% Cl, 0.058-0.096%) were lower than those for ropivacaine (0.092%; 95% Cl, 0.082-0.102%). The 0.015% difference was not statistically significant. There was no notable difference between treatment groups in the proportion of patients reporting drug-related adverse events. Conclusions. Levobupivacaine was 19% more potent than ropivacaine and provided similar safety results.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1386
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of 0.5% epidural levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean delivery [J].
Bader, AM ;
Tsen, LC ;
Camann, WR ;
Nephew, E ;
Datta, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (06) :1596-1601
[2]   Comparison of 0.25% S(-)-bupivacaine with 0.25% RS-bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labour [J].
Burke, D ;
Henderson, DJ ;
Simpson, AM ;
Faccenda, KA ;
Morrison, LMM ;
McGrady, EM ;
McLeod, GA ;
Bannister, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (05) :750-755
[3]   Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Fusco, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (01) :11-13
[4]   Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[5]   A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block [J].
Casati, A ;
Borghi, B ;
Fanelli, G ;
Cerchierini, E ;
Santorsola, R ;
Sassoli, V ;
Grispigni, C ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (04) :987-990
[6]   A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.75% with racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery [J].
Kopacz, DJ ;
Allen, HW ;
Thompson, GE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03) :642-648
[7]   The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor [J].
Lacassie, HJ ;
Columb, MO ;
Lacassie, HP ;
Lantadilla, RA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (01) :204-208
[8]   Epidural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine [J].
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Wilson, RC ;
Johnson, RV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 81 (06) :899-901
[9]   Comparative ventricular electrophysiologic effect of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine on the isolated rabbit heart [J].
Mazoit, JX ;
Decaux, A ;
Bouaziz, H ;
Edouard, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (03) :784-792
[10]   Levobupivacaine [J].
McLeod, GA ;
Burke, D .
ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (04) :331-341