Cautionary notes on the use of field experiments to address policy issues

被引：11

作者：

Harrison, Glenn W. ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Georgia State Univ, Robinson Coll Business, Dept Risk Management & Insurance, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA

[2] Georgia State Univ, Robinson Coll Business, Ctr Econ Anal Risk, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA

[3] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa

[4] IZA Inst Study Labor, Bonn, Germany

来源：

OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY | 2014年 / 30卷 / 04期

关键词：

field experiments; randomized evaluations; welfare; REFERENCE-DEPENDENT PREFERENCES; RANDOMIZATION; RISK; TIME;

D O I：

10.1093/oxrep/gru037

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Field experiments are popular again in policy circles. There are various types of field experiments, with complementary strengths and weaknesses for different policy questions. There is also a lot of needless hype about what field experiments can do. More balance in our use of field experiments is called for.

引用

页码：753 / 763

页数：11

共 58 条

[1] Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].

Andersen, Steffen ;

Harrison, Glenn W. ;

Lau, Morten I. ;

Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .

ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618

[2] Discounting behavior: A reconsideration [J].

Andersen, Steffen ;

Harrison, Glenn W. ;

Lau, Morten I. ;

Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 71 :15-33

[3] Estimating subjective probabilities [J].

Andersen, Steffen ;

Fountain, John ;

Harrison, Glenn W. ;

Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .

JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2014, 48 (03) :207-229

[4] Dual criteria decisions [J].

Andersen, Steffen ;

Harrison, Glenn W. ;

Lau, Morten Igel ;

Rutstroem, Elisabet E. .

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 41 :101-113

[5]

[Anonymous], 2010, AD DES CLIN TRIALS D

[6]

[Anonymous], EVALUATING WELFARE T

[7]

[Anonymous], 201404 GEORG STAT U

[8]

[Anonymous], SOCIAL EXPT EC POLIC

[9]

[Anonymous], AMBIGUITY

[10]

[Anonymous], 2014, PHILOS EC

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →