Diagnostic comparison of meteorological analyses during the 2002 antarctic winter

被引:39
作者
Manney, GL [1 ]
Allen, DR
Krüger, K
Naujokat, B
Santee, ML
Sabutis, JL
Pawson, S
Swinbank, R
Randall, CE
Simmons, AJ
Long, C
机构
[1] New Mexico Highlands Univ, Dept Nat Sci, Sch Educ, Las Vegas, NM 87701 USA
[2] New Mexico Highlands Univ, Dept Math Sci, Las Vegas, NM 87701 USA
[3] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] USN, Res Lab, Remote Sensing Div, Washington, DC 20375 USA
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Meteorol, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[8] Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[9] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Space Phys Lab, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[10] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading RG2 9AX, Berks, England
[11] NOAA, Climate Predict Ctr, Camp Springs, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/MWR2926.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Several meteorological datasets, including U.K. Met Office (MetO), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and NASA's Goddard Earth Observation System (GEOS-4) analyses, are being used in studies of the 2002 Southern Hemisphere (SH) stratospheric winter and Antarctic major warming. Diagnostics are compared to assess how these studies may be affected by the meteorological data used. While the overall structure and evolution of temperatures, winds, and wave diagnostics in the different analyses provide a consistent picture of the large-scale dynamics of the SH 2002 winter, several significant differences may affect detailed studies. The NCEP-NCAR reanalysis (REAN) and NCEP-Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 (REAN-2) datasets are not recommended for detailed studies, especially those related to polar processing, because of lower-stratospheric temperature biases that result in underestimates of polar processing potential, and because their winds and wave diagnostics show increasing differences from other analyses between similar to 30 and 10 hPa (their top level). Southern Hemisphere polar stratospheric temperatures in the ECMWF 40-Yr Re-analysis (ERA-40) show unrealistic vertical structure, so this long-term reanalysis is also unsuited for quantitative studies. The NCEP/Climate Prediction Center (CPC) objective analyses give an inferior representation of the upper-stratospheric vortex. Polar vortex transport barriers are similar in all analyses, but there is large variation in the amount, patterns, and timing of mixing, even among the operational assimilated datasets (ECMWF, MetO, and GEOS-4). The higher-resolution GEOS-4 and ECMWF assimilations provide significantly better representation of filamentation and small-scale structure than the other analyses, even when fields gridded at reduced resolution are studied. The choice of which analysis to use is most critical for detailed transport studies (including polar process modeling) and studies involving synoptic evolution in the upper stratosphere. The operational assimilated datasets are better suited for most applications than the NCEP/CPC objective analyses and the reanalysis datasets (REAN/REAN-2 and ERA-40).
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1278
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Unusual stratospheric transport and mixing during the 2002 Antarctic winter [J].
Allen, DR ;
Bevilacqua, RM ;
Nedoluha, GE ;
Randall, CE ;
Manney, GL .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (12) :1-1
[2]  
Allen DR, 2003, J ATMOS SCI, V60, P287, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0287:TELADT>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   A seasonal climatology of effective diffusivity in the stratosphere [J].
Allen, DR ;
Nakamura, N .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D8) :7917-7935
[5]   Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model [J].
Douglass, AR ;
Schoeberl, MR ;
Rood, RB ;
Pawson, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D9)
[6]   EVOLUTION OF POTENTIAL VORTICITY IN THE WINTER STRATOSPHERE OF JANUARY FEBRUARY 1979 [J].
DUNKERTON, TJ ;
DELISI, DP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1986, 91 (D1) :1199-1208
[7]   Lagrangian forecasting during ASHOE/MAESA: Analysis of predictive skill for analyzed and reverse-domain-filled potential vorticity [J].
Fairlie, TD ;
Pierce, RB ;
Grose, WL ;
Lingenfelser, G ;
Loewenstein, M ;
Podolske, JR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (11D) :13169-13182
[8]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF NARROW BAROCLINIC ZONES AND OTHER SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURE IN THE STRATOSPHERE DURING SIMULATED MAJOR WARMINGS [J].
FAIRLIE, TDA ;
FISHER, M ;
ONEILL, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 116 (492) :287-315
[9]   Three-dimensional model study of the Antarctic ozone hole in 2002 and comparison with 2000 [J].
Feng, W ;
Chipperfield, MP ;
Roscoe, HK ;
Remedios, JJ ;
Waterfall, AM ;
Stiller, GP ;
Glatthor, N ;
Höpfner, M ;
Wang, DY .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2005, 62 (03) :822-837
[10]  
FINGER FG, 1993, B AM METEOROL SOC, V74, P789, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<0789:EONUST>2.0.CO