Application of psychometric standards to scoring system evaluation: Is ''new'' necessarily ''improved''?

被引:15
作者
Fastenau, PS
Bennett, JM
Denburg, NL
机构
[1] HENRY FORD HOSP,DETROIT,MI 48202
[2] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,E LANSING,MI 48824
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01688639608409003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychometric guidelines are suggested that expand the evaluation of scoring systems beyond the most frequently (and often singly) considered criterion, that of interrater reliability. Principles of reliability and validity are elaborated and discussed with regard to scoring systems. Also addressed are assays for efficiency in applying a new system, the effects of rater proficiency on outcome scores, the comparison of costs and benefits of new scoring systems, and the comparison of a new scoring system to an existing system to demonstrate its advantage. As a timely example to illustrate these principles, a new scoring system is introduced for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and is compared to the most popular scoring system for this test (Lezak, 1983, p. 400). The proposed principles would be relevant to any scoring system that codes subjective behavioral data into objective values.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 472
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
FASTENAU PS, IN PRESS J CLIN EXPT
[12]   THE MEANING OF CONTENT VALIDITY [J].
FITZPATRICK, AR .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 7 (01) :3-13
[13]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, MEASUREMENT INTERRAT
[14]  
Hamby SL., 1993, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V5, P27, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.27
[15]  
KNIGHT J, 1994, 22 ANN M INT NEUR SO
[16]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[17]  
LEZAK MD, 1983, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL A
[18]  
Loring D W, 1990, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, V5, P1, DOI 10.1016/0887-6177(90)90002-7
[19]  
Osterrieth P.A., 1944, ARCH PSYCHOL, V30, P206
[20]  
Rey A, 1941, ARCH PSYCHOLOGIE, V28, P286