Incineration politics and the geographies of waste governance: a burning issue for Ireland?

被引:34
作者
Davies, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Geog, Dublin 2, Ireland
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2005年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/c0413j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The governance of waste in Ireland is highly contentious, with conflicts over many issues ranging from landfill expansion to charges for municipal waste collection. One of the most intense conflicts surrounds plans to introduce, over the forthcoming decade, incineration for municipal solid waste for the first time in the Republic. Such conflicts over waste incineration, and particularly over the siting of waste-incineration facilities, are not new phenomena and they have been examined empirically and theoretically through a range of disciplinary tenses and in different geographical contexts. These studies, although useful and interesting, rarely give close attention to the geographical strategies involved in such conflicts. The author's empirical investigation of incineration conflicts in Ireland reveals the centrality of a dynamic and evolving spatial dimension, both in the governing strategies adopted by the state in support of a system of waste management that involves a commitment to incineration, and in the transnational advocacy coalition approach adopted by antfincineration campaigners seeking alternatives to incineration. The author concludes that the scalar strategies surrounding incineration reveal the need for a more intricate analysis of power, politics, and place in the analysis of conflicts over waste governance, both in Ireland and beyond-an approach that may be more clearly articulated through a geographically informed understanding of governmentality.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 397
页数:23
相关论文
共 85 条
[51]   Canadian innovations in siting hazardous waste management facilities [J].
Kuhn, RG ;
Ballard, KR .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 22 (04) :533-545
[52]  
LAFFAN B, 1996, COHESION POLICY EURO, P320
[53]   On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator [J].
Lima, ML .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 24 (01) :71-84
[54]   NIMBY and the hazardous and toxic waste siting dilemma: The need for concept clarification [J].
Luloff, AE ;
Albrecht, SL ;
Bourke, L .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (01) :81-89
[55]   Confronting social movements with spatial theory: a review of Byron Miller's Geography and Social Movements [J].
Marston, SA .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 20 (07) :925-928
[56]  
Massey Doreen B., 2002, DEVELOPMENT, V45, P24
[57]  
MILLER B, 2001, GEOGRAPHY SOCIAL MOV
[58]   Putting discourse in its place: planning, sustainability and the urban capacity study [J].
Murdoch, J .
AREA, 2004, 36 (01) :50-58
[59]  
MURRAY R., 1999, Creating wealth from waste
[60]   NEGOTIATED COMPENSATION FOR SOLID-WASTE DISPOSAL-FACILITY SITING - AN ANALYSIS OF THE WISCONSIN EXPERIENCE [J].
NIEVES, LA ;
HIMMELBERGER, JJ ;
RATICK, SJ ;
WHITE, AL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (04) :505-511