Frameless stereotaxy using bone fiducial markers for deep brain stimulation

被引:148
作者
Holloway, KL
Gaede, SE
Starr, PA
Rosenow, JM
Ramakrishnan, V
Henderson, JM
机构
[1] Hosp Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Dept Neurosurg, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Hunter Holmes McGuire Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Parkinsons Dis Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
[4] St Johns Hosp, Tulsa, OK USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurosurg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
deep brain stimulation; frameless stereotaxy; stereotactic technique; computer-assisted therapy; surgical technique;
D O I
10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0404
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Functional neurosurgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) are traditionally performed with the aid of a stereotactic frame. Although frameless techniques have been perceived as less accurate, data from a recent phantom study of a modified frameless approach demonstrated a laboratory accuracy exceeding that obtained using a common frame system. The present study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a frameless system in routine clinical use. Methods. Deep brain stimulation leads were implanted in 38 patients by using a skull-mounted trajectory guide and an image-guided workstation. Registration was accomplished with bone fiducial markers. Final lead positions were measured on postoperative computerized tomography scans and compared with the planned lead positions. The accuracy of the Leksell frame within the clinical situation has been reported on in a recent study; these raw data served as a comparison data set. The difference between expected and actual lead locations in the x plane was 1.4 mm in the frame-based procedure and 1.6 mm in the frameless procedure. Similarly, the difference in the y plane was 1.6 mm in the frame-based system and 1.3 mm in the frameless one. The error was greatest in the z plane, that is, 1.7 min in the frame-based method and 2 mm in the frameless system. Multivariate analysis of variance demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of the two methods. Conclusions. The accuracy of the frame-based and frameless systems was not statistically significantly different (p 0.22). Note, however, that frameless techniques offer advantages in patient comfort, separation of imaging from surgery, and decreased operating time.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 413
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: Accuracy, precision, and applications [J].
Benardete, EA ;
Leonard, MA ;
Weiner, HL .
NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 49 (06) :1409-1415
[2]   Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies - Technical note [J].
Dorward, NL ;
Alberti, O ;
Palmer, JD ;
Kitchen, ND ;
Thomas, DGT .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 90 (01) :160-168
[3]   Clinical use of the optical digitizer for intracranial neuronavigation [J].
Germane, IM ;
Villalobos, H ;
Silvers, A ;
Post, KD .
NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 45 (02) :261-269
[4]  
Helm P A, 1998, Comput Aided Surg, V3, P51, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:2<51::AID-IGS1>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-J
[6]  
Hemler P F, 1995, J Image Guid Surg, V1, P35, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-712X(1995)1:1<35::AID-IGS6>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-N
[8]  
Henderson Jaimie M, 2004, Comput Aided Surg, V9, P155, DOI 10.3109/10929080500050249
[9]   Frameless localization for functional neurosurgical procedures: A preliminary accuracy study [J].
Henderson, JM .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 82 (04) :135-141
[10]  
Kitchen Neil D., 1993, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, V61, P195, DOI 10.1159/000100637