On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion

被引:236
作者
Collins, MW
Iverson, GL
Lovell, MR
McKeag, DB
Norwig, J
Maroon, J
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ctr Sports Med,Sports Concuss Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Sports Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Pittsburgh Steelers Football Club, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE | 2003年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
concussion; sports; grading systems; severity; loss of consciousness; ImPACT;
D O I
10.1097/00042752-200307000-00005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Investigate the relationship between on-field markers of concussion severity and postinjury neuropsychological and symptom presentation in an athlete-specific population. Design: Case control study. Setting: Multicenter analysis of high school and college athletes. Participants: A total of 78 athletes sustaining sports-related concussion were selected from a larger sample of 139 concussed athletes. Assessment of Predictor Variables: On-field presence of disorientation, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, and loss of consciousness. Main Outcome Measures: ImPACT, a computerized neuropsychological test battery, was administered pre-season and, on average, 2 days postinjury. Good postinjury presentation (n = 44) was defined as no measurable change, relative to baseline, in terms of both ImPACT memory and symptom composite scores. Poor presentation (n = 34) was defined as a 10-point increase in symptom reporting and 10-point decrease in memory functioning (exceeding the 80% confidence interval for measurement error on ImPACT). Athletes failing to meet good or poor selection criteria (n = 61) were not included in the analysis. Results: Odds ratios revealed that athletes demonstrating poor presentation at 2 days postinjury were over 10 times more likely (P < 0.001) to have exhibited retrograde amnesia following concussive injury when compared with athletes exhibiting good presentation. Similarly, athletes with poor presentation were over 4 times more likely (P < 0.013) to have exhibited posttraumatic amnesia and at least 5 minutes of mental status change. There were no differences between good and poor presentation groups in terms of on-field loss of consciousness. Conclusions: The presence of amnesia, not loss of consciousness, appears predictive of symptom and neurocognitive deficits following concussion in athletes. Athletes presenting with on-field amnesia should undergo comprehensive and individualized assessment prior to returning to sport participation. Continued refinement of sports concussion grading scales is war-ranted in lieu of consistent findings that brief loss of consciousness is not predictive of concussion injury severity.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 229
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC): On-site mental status evaluation of the athlete
    McCrea, M
    Kelly, JP
    Randolph, C
    Kluge, J
    Bartolic, E
    Finn, G
    Baxter, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1998, 13 (02) : 27 - 35
  • [32] Evidence-based review of sport-related concussion: Basic science
    McCrory, P
    Johnston, KM
    Mohtadi, NG
    Meeuwisse, W
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2001, 11 (03): : 160 - 165
  • [33] CEREBRAL CONCUSSION AND TRAUMATIC UNCONSCIOUSNESS - CORRELATION OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS ON BLUNT HEAD-INJURIES
    OMMAYA, AK
    GENNARELLI, TA
    [J]. BRAIN, 1974, 97 (DEC) : 633 - +
  • [34] Posner JB, 1982, DIAGNOSIS STUPOR COM, P3
  • [35] The cumulative effect of repetitive concussion in sports
    Rabadi, MH
    Jordan, BD
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2001, 11 (03): : 194 - 198
  • [36] Schnirring L, 2001, PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED, V29, P11
  • [37] SYMONDS C, 1962, LANCET, V1, P1
  • [38] SYMONDS CP, 1928, BRIT MED J, V4, P829
  • [39] WILSON JTL, 1994, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V56, P198
  • [40] YARNELL PR, 1970, LANCET, V1, P863