Credible commitment in carbon policy

被引:78
作者
Brunner, Steffen [1 ]
Flachsland, Christian [1 ]
Marschinski, Robert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
carbon pricing; climate policy frameworks; incentive mechanisms; regulatory uncertainty; INSTITUTIONS; QUANTITIES; DISCRETION; PRICES; RULES;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2011.582327
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this article the problem of credible commitment in carbon policy is discussed. Investors favour long-term predictability of the policy, but without any external enforcement mechanisms a commitment made by a government can be withdrawn, leading to scepticism and lack of credibility. This results in increased market risks and investment hold-up. Regulatory uncertainty stems from (i) strategic interactions between government and firms, (ii) potential learning about climate damage and abatement cost and (iii) political volatility. Although commitment to future policy encourages private investment, it also imposes costs in the form of reduced flexibility to accommodate new information or preferences. The article reviews devices that may help policy makers raise the level of commitment while also leaving some room for flexible adjustments. In particular, legislation of a long-term governance framework, delegation to an independent carbon agency and securitization of investors' stakes in emission markets offer palliative approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 271
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Investment subsidies and time-consistent environmental policy [J].
Abrego, L ;
Perroni, C .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2002, 54 (04) :617-635
[2]   Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy [J].
Aidt, TS .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 69 (01) :1-16
[3]   CREDIBILITY AND POLITICS [J].
ALESINA, A ;
TABELLINI, G .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1988, 32 (2-3) :542-550
[4]  
[Anonymous], RESP LEAD SUST FUT
[5]  
[Anonymous], RECIPE EC DECARBONIZ
[6]  
Baldursson FM, 2008, EUR ECON REV, V52, P1242, DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.01.002
[7]  
Barnes P, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P724, DOI 10.1126/science.319.5864.724b
[8]  
Barrett S., 2003, Environment Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0470024747, 10.1002/0470024747]
[9]   RULES, DISCRETION AND REPUTATION IN A MODEL OF MONETARY-POLICY [J].
BARRO, RJ ;
GORDON, DB .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1983, 12 (01) :101-121
[10]   DYNAMIC POLLUTION REGULATION [J].
BIGLAISER, G ;
HOROWITZ, JK ;
QUIGGIN, J .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1995, 8 (01) :33-44