R&D Programmes, Policy Mix, and the 'European Paradox': Evidence from European SMEs

被引:43
作者
Radicic, Dragana [1 ]
Pugh, Geoffrey [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[2] Staffordshire Univ, Business Sch, Ctr Appl Business Res, Fac Business Educ & Law, Leek Rd, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DF, Staffs, England
关键词
R&D support; SMEs; policy mix; input and output additionality; European paradox; INNOVATION POLICY; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATION; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; MATCHING ESTIMATORS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; SAMPLE PROPERTIES; DEMAND-SIDE; FIRM LEVEL; ADDITIONALITY;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scw077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using a sample of small and medium-sized enterprises from twenty-eight European countries, this study evaluates the input and output additionality of national and European Union (EU) R&D programmes both separately and in combination. Accordingly, we contribute to understanding the effectiveness of innovation policy from the perspective of policy mix. Empirical results are different for innovation inputs and outputs. For innovation inputs, we found positive treatment effects from national and EU programmes separately as well as complementary effects for firms supported from both sources relative to firms supported only by national programmes. For innovation outputs, we report no evidence of additionality from national programmes and cannot reject crowding out from EU programmes. However, crowding out from EU support is eliminated by combination with national support. These findings have policy implications for the governance of R&D policy and suggest that the European paradox-success in promoting R&D inputs but not commercialisation-is not yet mitigated.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 512
页数:16
相关论文
共 93 条
[71]   Output Additionality of Public Support for Innovation: Evidence for Irish Manufacturing Plants [J].
Hewitt-Dundas, Nola ;
Roper, Stephen .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2010, 18 (01) :107-122
[72]   Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score [J].
Hirano, K ;
Imbens, GW ;
Ridder, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (04) :1161-1189
[73]   (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes [J].
Hottenrott, Hanna ;
Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (06) :1055-1066
[74]   R&D AND SUBSIDIES AT THE FIRM LEVEL: AN APPLICATION OF PARAMETRIC AND SEMIPARAMETRIC TWO-STEP SELECTION MODELS [J].
Hussinger, Katrin .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 23 (06) :729-747
[75]   Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review [J].
Imbens, GW .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (01) :4-29
[76]  
Kline S. J., 2010, POSITIVE SUM STRATEG, P173, DOI DOI 10.1108/14601069810368485
[77]   The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality [J].
Knockaert, Mirjam ;
Spithoven, Andre ;
Clarysse, Bart .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 81 :376-387
[78]   The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: Theory and evidence from multi-country data [J].
Lee, Chang-Yang .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (5-6) :256-269
[79]   LEARNING FROM OPENNESS: THE DYNAMICS OF BREADTH IN EXTERNAL INNOVATION LINKAGES [J].
Love, James H. ;
Roper, Stephen ;
Vahter, Priit .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (11) :1703-1716
[80]   Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix [J].
Magro, Edurne ;
Wilson, James R. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (09) :1647-1656