Comparison of measured and modeled stratospheric UV/visible actinic fluxes at large solar zenith angles

被引:13
作者
Bösch, H [1 ]
Camy-Peyret, C
Chipperfield, M
Fitzenberger, R
Harder, H
Schiller, C
Schneider, M
Trautmann, T
Pfeilsticker, K
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Umweltphys, INF 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Paris 06, CNRS, LPMA, Paris, France
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Environm, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Max Planck Inst Chem, Mainz, Germany
[5] FZ Julich, Inst Stratosphar Chem, Julich, Germany
[6] NOAA, Aeron Lab, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000GL012134
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Measured and modeled stratospheric filter sensitivity weighted ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) actinic fluxes - approximating the NO2 photolysis rate coefficients (j(NO2)) - are compared. The measurements were performed with two calibrated a 2 pi -actinometers assembled on the azimuth angle-controlled LPMA/DOAS (Laboratoire de Physique Moleculaire et Applications / Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) gondola during a series of balloon flights. Since the actinometer's spectral sensitivity curve did not exactly match the actinic spectrum of NO2 and the skylight's spectrum shape changes with atmospheric height and solar illumination, only proxies (proxy-)j(NO2) rather than true j(NO2) values were monitored during balloon ascents (0-30 km) for solar zenith angle (SZA) 75 degrees < SZA < 86 degrees, and at balloon float altitude during solar occultation (86 degrees < SZA < 95 degrees). The measured direct and diffuse total proxy-j(NO2), values compare excellently with radiative transfer (RT) modeling. That finding allows us to rule out uncertainties in computing UV/vis actinic fluxes as a significant factor in the still insufficient modeling of stratospheric NO2 at large SZAs.
引用
收藏
页码:1179 / 1182
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[21]  
*WMO, 1996, 16 WMO GLOB OZ RES M, V1
[22]   Validation of the UARS solar ultraviolet irradiances: Comparison with the ATLAS 1 and 2 measurements [J].
Woods, TN ;
Prinz, DK ;
Rottman, GJ ;
London, J ;
Crane, PC ;
Cebula, RP ;
Hilsenrath, E ;
Brueckner, GE ;
Andrews, MD ;
White, OR ;
VanHoosier, ME ;
Floyd, LE ;
Herring, LC ;
Knapp, BG ;
Pankratz, CK ;
Reiser, PA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D6) :9541-9569