Effect of anti-IL-6 and anti-10 monoclonal antibodies on the suppression of the normal T lymphocyte mitogenic response by steady state sickle cell disease sera

Previously published work has shown that sera from healthy sickle cell disease (SCD) patients inhibits normal lymphocyte mitogenic response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in vitro. The current study is to attempt to ascertain what effect antibody to type 2 cytokines, interleukin (IL)-6 and 10, have on the suppression of lymphocyte PHA response by SCD sera. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), separated by density gradient were obtained from 2 healthy normal donors. Sera from 50 healthy SCD patients, 50 normal healthy controls and pooled normal O, Rh+ (O+) sera were utilized in standard in vitro PHA stimulation of PBMC cultures. Mitogenic responses were expressed as mean counts per minute (cpm) of triplicate cultures. Fifty triplicate cultures of PHA stimulated normal PBMC were done with 10% normal pooled O+, normal control and SCD steady state sera only. In addition 50 cultures were done with SCD sera containing 1 mug/ml of anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, as well as 28 SCD serum cultures containing 1 mug/ml of anti-IL-10 monoclonal antibody. The final 11 SCD serum culture experiments contained a combination of both anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-10 antibody, each at the concentration of 1 mug/ml. Results revealed > 15% suppression of mitogenic response in the SCD sera supplemented cultures as compared to control sera in 47/50 (94%) and in 40/50 (80%) of normal pooled O+, as calculated by mean cpm. The degree of suppression ranged from 17% to 98% in individual experiments. The addition of anti-IL-6 antibody alone significantly improved mean cpm (> 20%) in 19/50 (38%) of SCD serum responses compared to O+ sera and 23/50 (46%) of control sera. Complete correction occurred in 9/50 (18%) of all SCD serum suppressions as compared to O+ sera and 6/50 (12%) when compared to control sera. Similarly, anti-IL-10 antibody decreased suppression of the mean cpm of SCD serum cultures in 18/28 (64%) and completely corrected 3/18 (11%). The combined antibody data revealed > 20% increase in mean cpm in 10/11(91%) experiments. Inhibitors of mitogenic response were present in a significant percentage of the SCD sera utilized in the present study. The significant corrective effects of both monoclonal antibodies would seem to support the original hypothesis that high circulating levels of type 2 cytokines may represent the cell-mediated dependent inhibitory factors expressed in the sera of many healthy SCD patients.