Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: a help as well as a hindrance?

被引:64
作者
Vythilingam, M.
Blair, K. S.
McCaffrey, D.
Scaramozza, M.
Jones, M.
Nakic, M.
Mondillo, K.
Hadd, K.
Bonne, O.
Mitchell, D. G. V.
Pine, D. S.
Charney, D. S.
Blair, R. J. R.
机构
[1] NIMH, Mood & Anxiety Program, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychiat, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[6] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Off Dean, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S003329170700092X
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1455
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Amygdala response in patients with acute PTSD to masked and unmasked emotional facial expressions [J].
Armony, JL ;
Corbo, V ;
Clément, MH ;
Brunet, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 162 (10) :1961-1963
[2]  
Atkinson R. C., 1973, Attention and Performance, P583
[3]   ARE LEXICAL DECISIONS A GOOD MEASURE OF LEXICAL ACCESS - THE ROLE OF WORD-FREQUENCY IN THE NEGLECTED DECISION STAGE [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (03) :340-357
[4]   Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study [J].
Bar-Haim, Yair ;
Lamy, Dominique ;
Pergamin, Lee ;
Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J. ;
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (01) :1-24
[5]   Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition [J].
Binder, JR ;
McKiernan, KA ;
Parsons, ME ;
Westbury, CF ;
Possing, ET ;
Kaufman, JN ;
Buchanan, L .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (03) :372-393
[6]   Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion [J].
Blair, K. S. ;
Smith, B. W. ;
Mitchell, D. G. V. ;
Morton, J. ;
Vythilingam, M. ;
Pessoa, L. ;
Fridberg, D. ;
Zametkin, A. ;
Nelson, E. E. ;
Drevets, W. C. ;
Pine, D. S. ;
Martin, A. ;
Blair, R. J. R. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 35 (01) :430-440
[7]  
Blair RJR., 2005, The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain
[8]  
Blake D.D., 1990, The Behavior Therapist, V18, P187, DOI [10.1002/jts.2490080106, DOI 10.1007/BF02105408]
[9]  
BLAKE DD, 1995, J TRAUMA STRESS, V8, P75, DOI 10.1002/jts.2490080106
[10]   PROCESSING THREATENING INFORMATION IN POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER [J].
BRYANT, RA ;
HARVEY, AG .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 104 (03) :537-541