Biased emotional attention in post-traumatic stress disorder: a help as well as a hindrance?

被引:64
作者
Vythilingam, M.
Blair, K. S.
McCaffrey, D.
Scaramozza, M.
Jones, M.
Nakic, M.
Mondillo, K.
Hadd, K.
Bonne, O.
Mitchell, D. G. V.
Pine, D. S.
Charney, D. S.
Blair, R. J. R.
机构
[1] NIMH, Mood & Anxiety Program, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychiat, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[6] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Off Dean, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S003329170700092X
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, the emotional attentional bias in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be conceptualized either as emotional hyper-responsiveness or as reduced priming of task-relevant representations due to dysfunction in 'top-down' regulatory systems. We investigated these possibilities both with respect to threatening and positive stimuli among traumatized individuals with and without PTSD. Method. Twenty-two patients with PTSD, 21 trauma controls and 20 non-traumatized healthy participants were evaluated on two tasks. For one of these tasks, the affective Stroop task (aST), the emotional stimuli act as distracters and interfere with task performance. For the other, the emotional lexical decision task (eLDT), emotional information facilitates task performance. Results. Compared to trauma controls and healthy participants, patients with PTSD showed increased interference for negative but not positive distracters on the aST and increased emotional facilitation for negative words on the eLDT. Conclusions. These findings document that hyper-responsiveness to threat but not to positive stimuli is specific for patients with PTSD.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1455
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: The role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex [J].
Nakic, M ;
Smith, BW ;
Busis, S ;
Vythilingam, M ;
Blair, RJR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (04) :1752-1761
[32]   Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity [J].
Pansky, A ;
Algom, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (02) :259-274
[33]   Attentional and memory bias for emotional information in crime victims with acute posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [J].
Paunovic, N ;
Lundh, LG ;
Öst, LG .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (06) :675-692
[34]   Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli [J].
Pessoa, L ;
Ungerleider, LG .
ROOTS OF VISUAL AWARENESS: A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF ALAN COWEY, 2003, 144 :171-182
[35]   Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing [J].
Plaut, DC ;
Booth, JR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2000, 107 (04) :786-823
[36]   Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: A functional MRI study [J].
Rauch, SL ;
Whalen, PJ ;
Shin, LM ;
McInerney, SC ;
Macklin, ML ;
Lasko, NB ;
Orr, SP ;
Pitman, RK .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 47 (09) :769-776
[37]  
Rauch SL, 2003, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V985, P389
[38]  
RUSH AJ, 1986, PSYCHIAT RES, V18, P65
[39]   Reliability and validity of a Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A) [J].
Shear, MK ;
Vander Bilt, J ;
Rucci, P ;
Endicott, J ;
Lydiard, B ;
Otto, MW ;
Pollack, MH ;
Chandler, L ;
Williams, J ;
Ali, A ;
Frank, DM .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2001, 13 (04) :166-178
[40]   PERCEPTION OF EMOTIONAL WORDS [J].
STRAUSS, E .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1983, 21 (01) :99-103