Public perceptions of CCS: Emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications

被引:77
作者
Upham, Paul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roberts, Thomas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Ctr Integrated Energy Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Kent, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Perceptions; Attitudes; CARBON-DIOXIDE; STORAGE; CAPTURE; ACCEPTANCE; UK; INFORMATION; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.06.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper reports on European public perceptions of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as determined through six focus groups, one held in each of the UK, the Netherlands, Poland, Germany, Belgium and Spain. The development of opinion and the emergence of concerns were observed via phased exposure to a specially commissioned film providing an overview of CCS technology, its rationale and associated debates, supplemented by additional information on national energy mixes. In general there was a high level of commonality in opinion and concerns across the six countries, with only minor differences. The concerns that emerged were not allayed by the information provided. On the contrary, there was evidence of a shift from initial uncertainty about CCS to negative positions. CCS was generally perceived as an uncertain, end-of-pipe technology that will perpetuate fossil-fuel dependence. Noting the political. context to CCS, we conclude that advocates will likely find the European public opinion context a challenging one in which to achieve deployment, particularly for onshore storage, except where local communities perceive real economic or other benefits to CCS. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1367
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[2]  
[Anonymous], BURYING CARBON SEA I
[3]  
Beck U., 2007, The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society
[4]  
Bedford T., 2001, QUALITATIVE METHODOL
[5]   Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste [J].
Bickerstaff, K. ;
Lorenzoni, I. ;
Pidgeon, N. F. ;
Poortinga, W. ;
Simmons, P. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (02) :145-169
[6]  
Bryman A., 2018, Samhallsvetenskapliga metoder
[7]   Informed Public Opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options [J].
de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ;
Daamen, Dancker ;
Ramirez, Andrea Ramirez ;
Faaij, Andre ;
Hendriks, Chris ;
de Visser, Erika .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :4795-4802
[8]   Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands [J].
de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ;
Daamen, Dancker ;
Faaij, Andre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (03) :322-332
[9]  
Desbarats J., 2010, Review of the Public Participation Practices for CCS and Non-CCS Projects in Europe
[10]   Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low-Carbon Technologies [J].
Fleishman, Lauren A. ;
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine ;
Morgan, M. Granger .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (09) :1399-1410