A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems

被引:285
作者
Harris, TJ [1 ]
Seppala, CT
Desborough, LD
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Honeywell Hispec Solut, Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
controller performance; minimum variance control; multivariate systems;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-1524(98)00031-6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A comprehensive approach for assessing the effectiveness of control systems requires: (i) determination of the capability of the control system, (ii) development of suitable statistics for monitoring the performance of the existing system, (iii) development of methods for diagnosing the underlying causes for changes in the performance of the control system, and (iv) incorporation of these methods in an industrial setting. This framework for analyzing the performance of control loops will be reviewed. These concepts were initially developed using a performance benchmark of minimum variance control for single-input single-output systems (SISO). Extensions to multiple-input single-output (MISO) and multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) processes have also been developed by a number of authors. Regulation of stochastic and deterministic disturbances, as well as set-point tracking are readily accommodated with these methods. A number of alternate approaches based on fault-detection have also been proposed and several of these methods will also be reviewed. Although these performance benchmarks and monitoring methods have proven to be extremely useful in large scale industrial applications, there remain a number of outstanding theoretical and practical issues. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]  
Box G.E., 1978, STAT EXPT
[12]   INTERVENTION ANALYSIS WITH APPLICATIONS TO ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
TIAO, GC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (349) :70-79
[13]   Identification of finite impulse response models: Methods and robustness issues [J].
Dayal, BS ;
MacGregor, JF .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1996, 35 (11) :4078-4090
[14]   PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT MEASURES FOR UNIVARIATE FEEDFORWARD FEEDBACK-CONTROL [J].
DESBOROUGH, L ;
HARRIS, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 71 (04) :605-616
[15]  
DESBOROUGH LD, 1992, CAN J CHEM ENG, V70, P186
[16]   EVALUATION OF PROCESS-CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS AND DIAGNOSIS OF VARIATION IN PAPER BASIS WEIGHT VIA MULTIVARIATE TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS [J].
DEVRIES, WR ;
WU, SM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1978, 23 (04) :702-708
[17]   THE ROLE OF THE INTERACTOR MATRIX IN MULTIVARIABLE STOCHASTIC ADAPTIVE-CONTROL [J].
DUGARD, L ;
GOODWIN, GC ;
XIE, XY .
AUTOMATICA, 1984, 20 (05) :701-709
[18]  
ENDER DB, 1993, CONTROL ENG SEP, P180
[19]  
ERIKSSON PG, 1994, 3 IEEE C CONTR APPL, P1029
[20]  
Fasolo P.S., 1995, HVAC R RES, V1, P177, DOI [10.1080/10789669.1995.10391318, DOI 10.1080/10789669.1995.10391318]