Study of lung density corrections in a clinical trial (RTOG 88-08)

被引:28
作者
Orton, CG
Chungbin, S
Klein, EE
Gillin, MT
Schultheiss, TE
Sause, WT
机构
[1] Karmanos Canc Inst, Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Radiat Oncol Ctr, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] LDS Hosp, Ctr Radiat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1998年 / 41卷 / 04期
关键词
lung corrections; inhomogeneity corrections; clinical trials; lung densities; treatment planning; density corrections;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00117-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of lung density corrections on the dose delivered to lung canter radiotherapy patients in a multi-institutional clinical trial, and to determine whether commonly available density-correction algorithms are sufficient to improve the accuracy and precision of dose calculation in the clinical trials setting. Methods and Materials: A benchmark problem was designed land a corresponding phantom fabricated) to test density-correction algorithms under standard conditions for photon beams ranging from Co-60 to, 24 MV. Point doses and isodose distributions submitted for a Phase III trial in regionally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 88-08) were calculated with and without density correction. Tumor doses were analyzed for 322 patients and 1236 separate fields. Results: For the benchmark problem studied here, the overall correction factor for a four-held treatment varied significantly with energy, ranging from 1.14 (Co-60) to 1.05 (24 MV) for measured doses, or 1.17 (Co-60) to 1.05 (24 MV) for doses calculated by conventional density-correction algorithms. For the patient data, overall correction factors (calculated) ranged from 0.95 to 1.28, with a mean of 1.05 and distributional standard deviation of 0.05, The largest corrections were for lateral fields, with a mean correction factor of 1.11 and standard deviation of 0.08, Conclusions: Lung inhomogeneities can lead to significant variations in delivered dose between patients treated in a clinical trial. Existing density-correction algorithms are accurate enough to significantly reduce these variations. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 794
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   IMPLICATIONS OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTIONS IN PHOTON BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS [J].
SONTAG, MR ;
BATTISTA, JJ ;
BRONSKILL, MJ ;
CUNNINGHAM, JR .
RADIOLOGY, 1977, 124 (01) :143-149
[32]   EQUIVALENT TISSUE-AIR RATIO METHOD FOR MAKING ABSORBED DOSE CALCULATIONS IN A HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM [J].
SONTAG, MR ;
CUNNINGHAM, JR .
RADIOLOGY, 1978, 129 (03) :787-794
[33]   VALIDITY OF LUNG CORRECTION ALGORITHMS [J].
TANG, WL ;
KHAN, FM ;
GERBI, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 13 (05) :683-686
[34]   EVALUATION OF DENSITY CORRECTION ALGORITHMS FOR PHOTON-BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS [J].
TATCHER, M ;
PALTI, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 141 (01) :201-205
[35]   LUNG DOSE CALCULATIONS USING COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY - IS THERE A NEED FOR PIXEL BASED PROCEDURES [J].
VANDYK, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1983, 9 (07) :1035-1041
[36]   LUNG DENSITY AS MEASURED BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR RADIOTHERAPY [J].
VANDYK, J ;
KEANE, TJ ;
RIDER, WD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (08) :1363-1372
[37]  
VANTRIET A, 1985, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V11, P621, DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90198-1
[38]   VERIFICATION BY MONTE-CARLO METHODS OF A POWER LAW TISSUE AIR RATIO ALGORITHM FOR INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTIONS IN PHOTON-BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS [J].
WEBB, S ;
FOX, RA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (02) :225-240
[39]  
WELKER K, 1990, Radiobiologia Radiotherapia, V31, P39
[40]   THE HUMAN PRO-OPIOMELANOCORTIN GENE - ORGANIZATION, SEQUENCE, AND INTERSPERSION WITH REPETITIVE DNA [J].
WHITFELD, PL ;
SEEBURG, PH ;
SHINE, J .
DNA-A JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR & CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1982, 1 (02) :133-143