Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework

被引:74
作者
de Jonge, Janneke [1 ]
van Trijp, Hans [1 ]
Goddard, Ellen [2 ]
Frewer, Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Marketing & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
food safety; confidence; trust; risk management; risk communication; risk perception;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers' lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]   Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards [J].
Miles, S ;
Frewer, LJ .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2001, 12 (01) :47-61
[42]   A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease [J].
Pennings, JME ;
Wansink, B ;
Meulenberg, MTG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2002, 19 (01) :91-100
[43]   Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? [J].
Poortinga, W ;
Pidgeon, NF .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (01) :199-209
[44]   Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation [J].
Poortinga, W ;
Pidgeon, NF .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (05) :961-972
[45]   The "trust gap" hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors [J].
Priest, SH ;
Bonfadelli, H ;
Rusanen, M .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (04) :751-766
[46]  
Renn O., 1991, Communicating Risks to the Public, P175, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
[47]   Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Ritchey, PN ;
Frank, RA ;
Hursti, UK ;
Tuorila, H .
APPETITE, 2003, 40 (02) :163-173
[48]   Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden [J].
Rowe, G ;
Frewer, L ;
Sjöberg, L .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2000, 9 (01) :59-78
[49]  
Schermelleh-Engel K., 2003, Methods of Psychological Research Online, V8, P23, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470010940
[50]   Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe [J].
Scholderer, J ;
Brunso, K ;
Bredahl, L ;
Grunert, KG .
APPETITE, 2004, 42 (02) :197-211