Volumetric assessment of preload in trauma patients: Addressing the problem of mathematical coupling

被引:24
作者
Chang, MC
Black, CS
Meredith, JW
机构
[1] Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem
[2] Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1095, Medical Center Boulevard
来源
SHOCK | 1996年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00024382-199611000-00004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The availability of the volumetric thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter allows preload assessment based on ventricular volume rather than pressure. This technique has been shown clinically to be a better measure of preload than the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). Critics of the technique argue that the use of thermodilution to measure cardiac output (GO) accounts for the better correlation between right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and CO than PAOP and CO, since stroke volume derived from the CO is a common term to both RVEDV and CO. Previous studies have attempted mathematical corrections for this coupling effect, but direct comparisons using a nonthermodilution measure of CO have not been reported. Our objective was to evaluate the importance of mathematical coupling between RVEDV and CO by assessing the ability of RVEDV to predict CO measured by thermodilution (COTH) compared with CO simultaneously determined by the Fick principle (COFICK). We performed a prospective study of 53 consecutive trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center between 10/1/94 and 6/1/95 who received a volumetric pulmonary artery catheter. Using linear regression analysis, RVEDV and PAOP were correlated with simultaneous measurements of both CO,,,, determined via indirect calorimetry and COTH. Fisher's z-transformation was used to evaluate the correlation coefficients for significant differences (p < .05). The correlation coefficients for RVEDV vs. COTH and RVEDV vs, COFICK were similar (.48 vs, 0.45, p = .76). There was a significant correlation between COTH and COFICK (r = .74, p < .001). RVEDV was significantly better than PAOP at predicting both COTH (p < .001) and COFICK (p = .04). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that RVEDV was the only estimate of preload which was significantly related to CO. We conclude that mathematical coupling does not have a significant clinical effect on the relationship between RVEDV and CO.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 329
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   MATHEMATIC COUPLING OF DATA - A COMMON SOURCE OF ERROR [J].
ARCHIE, JP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1981, 193 (03) :296-303
[2]   INFLUENCE OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURE ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR PRESSURE AND DIMENSION [J].
BEMIS, CE ;
SERUR, JR ;
BORKENHAGEN, D ;
SONNENBLICK, EH ;
URSCHEL, CW .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1974, 34 (04) :498-504
[3]  
Chang MC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P728
[4]   END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME VERSUS PULMONARY-ARTERY WEDGE PRESSURE IN EVALUATING CARDIAC PRELOAD IN TRAUMA PATIENTS [J].
DIEBEL, L ;
WILSON, RF ;
HEINS, J ;
LARKY, H ;
WARSOW, K ;
WILSON, S .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1994, 37 (06) :950-955
[5]  
DIEBEL LN, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P817
[6]   RIGHT-VENTRICULAR END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AS A MEASURE OF PRELOAD [J].
DURHAM, R ;
NEUNABER, K ;
VOGLER, G ;
SHAPIRO, M ;
MAZUSKI, J .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1995, 39 (02) :218-224
[7]  
FULLER HD, 1992, CLIN INVEST MED, V15, P103
[8]   CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENT OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT BY THE FICK PRINCIPLE - CLINICAL VALIDATION IN INTENSIVE-CARE [J].
KEINANEN, O ;
TAKALA, J ;
KARI, A .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (03) :360-365
[9]   COMPARISON OF A MODIFIED FICK METHOD WITH THERMODILUTION FOR DETERMINING CARDIAC-OUTPUT IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS ON MECHANICAL VENTILATION [J].
LYNCH, J ;
KAEMMERER, H .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1990, 16 (04) :248-251
[10]   OXYGEN FICK AND MODIFIED CARBON-DIOXIDE FICK CARDIAC OUTPUTS [J].
MAHUTTE, CK ;
JAFFE, MB ;
CHEN, PA ;
SASSE, SA ;
WONG, DH ;
SASSOON, CSH .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (01) :86-95