Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States

被引:481
作者
Weber, Elke U. [1 ,2 ]
Stern, Paul C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Res Environm Decis, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] CNR, Div Behav & Social Sci & Educ, Comm Human Dimens Global Change, Washington, DC 20418 USA
关键词
risk perception; climate change perception; mental models; expert-novice differences; PEOPLE KNOW; RISK; PERCEPTIONS; COMMUNICATION; EXPERIENCE; POLICY; WILLINGNESS; BELIEFS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1037/a0023253
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article considers scientific and public understandings of climate change and addresses the following question: Why is it that while scientific evidence has accumulated to document global climate change and scientific opinion has solidified about its existence and causes, U.S. public opinion has not and has instead become more polarized? Our review supports a constructivist account of human judgment. Public understanding is affected by the inherent difficulty of understanding climate change, the mismatch between people's usual modes of understanding and the task, and, particularly in the United States, a continuing societal struggle to shape the frames and mental models people use to understand the phenomena. We conclude by discussing ways in which psychology can help to improve public understanding of climate change and link a better understanding to action.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 328
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[71]   ARE THERE UNIVERSAL ASPECTS IN THE STRUCTURE AND CONTENTS OF HUMAN-VALUES [J].
SCHWARTZ, SH .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1994, 50 (04) :19-45
[72]  
Schwartz SH, 1977, Advances in experimental social psychology, P221, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
[73]   QUANTIFYING THE CREDIBILITY OF ENERGY PROJECTIONS FROM TRENDS IN PAST DATA - THE UNITED-STATES ENERGY SECTOR [J].
SHLYAKHTER, AI ;
KAMMEN, DM ;
BROIDO, CL ;
WILSON, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (02) :119-130
[74]   Emotional and deliberative reactions to a public crisis - Mad Cow disease in France [J].
Sinaceur, M ;
Heath, C ;
Cole, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (03) :247-254
[75]   The empirical case for two systems of reasoning [J].
Sloman, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :3-22
[76]   PERCEPTION OF RISK [J].
SLOVIC, P .
SCIENCE, 1987, 236 (4799) :280-285
[77]  
Smithson M., 2008, Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives, P13
[78]   Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions [J].
Solomon, Susan ;
Plattner, Gian-Kasper ;
Knutti, Reto ;
Friedlingstein, Pierre .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (06) :1704-1709
[79]   Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada [J].
Soroka, SN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (03) :264-285
[80]  
Spence A, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P46, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1059, 10.1038/nclimate1059]