Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy

被引:27
作者
Groenewoud, JH
Pijnappel, RM
van den Akker-van Marle, ME
Birnie, E
Buijs-van der Woude, T
Mali, WTPM
de Koning, HJ
Buskens, E
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen, Dept Radiol, NL-9700 RM Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
breast radiography; biopsies; cost-effectiveness; cancer screening;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6601520
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates that the introduction of large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) replacing needle-localised breast biopsy (NLBB) for nonpalpable (screen-detected) breast lesions could result in substantial cost savings at the expense of a possible slight increase in breast cancer mortality. The cost-effectiveness of LCNB and NLBB was estimated using a microsimulation model. The sensitivity of LCNB (0.97) and resource use and costs of LCNB and NLBB were derived from a multicentre consecutive cohort study among 973 women who consented in getting LCNB and NLBB, if LCNB was negative. Sensitivity analyses were per-formed. Replacing NLBB with LCNB would result in approximately six more breast cancer deaths per year (in a target population of 2.1 million women), or in 1000 extra life-years lost from breast cancer (effect over 100 years). The total costs of management of breast cancer (3% discounted) are estimated at pound4676 million with NLBB; introducing LCNB would save pound: 13 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of continued NLBB vs LCNB would be pound 12 482 per additional life-year gained (3% discounted); incremental costs range from pound-21 687 (low threshold for breast biopsy) to pound74 378 (high sensitivity of LCNB).
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 392
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Boer R, 1998, BRIT MED J, V317, P376
  • [2] In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening
    Boer, R
    deKoning, HJ
    vanOortmarssen, GJ
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (12) : 2040 - 2043
  • [3] Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit
    Britton, PD
    Flower, CDR
    Freeman, AH
    Sinnatamby, R
    Warren, R
    Goddard, MJ
    Wight, DGD
    Bobrow, L
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (10) : 764 - 767
  • [4] Cost comparison between stereotactic large-core-needle biopsy versus surgical excision biopsy in The Netherlands
    Buijs-van der Woude, T
    Verkooijen, HM
    Pijnappel, RM
    Klinkenbijl, JHG
    Rinks, IHMB
    Peeters, PHM
    Buskens, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (14) : 1736 - 1745
  • [5] THE IMPACT OF A BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM ON QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE-YEARS
    DEHAES, JCJM
    DEKONING, HJ
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    VANAGT, HME
    DEBRUYN, AE
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 49 (04) : 538 - 544
  • [6] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS - POLICY ALTERNATIVES, QUALITY-OF-LIFE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF UNCERTAIN FACTORS
    DEKONING, HJ
    VANINEVELD, BM
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    DEHAES, JCJM
    COLLETTE, HJA
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANDERMAAS, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 49 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [7] DEKONING HJ, 1995, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V87, P1217
  • [8] THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COST AND CHARGES
    FINKLER, SA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1982, 96 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [9] BREAST BIOPSY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF STEREOTAXICALLY GUIDED CORE AND EXCISIONAL TECHNIQUES
    GISVOLD, JJ
    GOELLNER, JR
    GRANT, CS
    DONOHUE, JH
    SYKES, MW
    KARSELL, PR
    COFFEY, SL
    JUNG, SH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (04) : 815 - 820
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions
    Hrung, JM
    Langlotz, CP
    Orel, SG
    Fox, KR
    Schnall, MD
    Schwartz, JS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 39 - 49