Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy

被引:27
作者
Groenewoud, JH
Pijnappel, RM
van den Akker-van Marle, ME
Birnie, E
Buijs-van der Woude, T
Mali, WTPM
de Koning, HJ
Buskens, E
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen, Dept Radiol, NL-9700 RM Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
breast radiography; biopsies; cost-effectiveness; cancer screening;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6601520
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates that the introduction of large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) replacing needle-localised breast biopsy (NLBB) for nonpalpable (screen-detected) breast lesions could result in substantial cost savings at the expense of a possible slight increase in breast cancer mortality. The cost-effectiveness of LCNB and NLBB was estimated using a microsimulation model. The sensitivity of LCNB (0.97) and resource use and costs of LCNB and NLBB were derived from a multicentre consecutive cohort study among 973 women who consented in getting LCNB and NLBB, if LCNB was negative. Sensitivity analyses were per-formed. Replacing NLBB with LCNB would result in approximately six more breast cancer deaths per year (in a target population of 2.1 million women), or in 1000 extra life-years lost from breast cancer (effect over 100 years). The total costs of management of breast cancer (3% discounted) are estimated at pound4676 million with NLBB; introducing LCNB would save pound: 13 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of continued NLBB vs LCNB would be pound 12 482 per additional life-year gained (3% discounted); incremental costs range from pound-21 687 (low threshold for breast biopsy) to pound74 378 (high sensitivity of LCNB).
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 392
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up
    Jackman, RJ
    Nowels, KW
    Rodriguez-Soto, J
    Marzoni, FA
    Finkelstein, SI
    Shepard, MJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) : 799 - 805
  • [12] Lipscomb J., 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
  • [13] Long-term effects of mammography screening:: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials
    Nyström, L
    Andersson, I
    Bjurstam, N
    Frisell, J
    Nordenskjöld, B
    Rutqvist, LE
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9310) : 909 - 919
  • [14] OOSTENBRINK JB, 2000, HANDLEIDING KOSTENON
  • [15] Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review
    Otto, SJ
    Fracheboud, J
    Looman, CWN
    Broeders, MJM
    Boer, R
    Hendriks, JHCL
    Verbeek, ALM
    de Koning, HJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9367) : 1411 - 1417
  • [16] Pijnappel R M, 2001, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V145, P691
  • [17] The diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy in palpable and non-palpable breast lesions
    Pijnappel, RM
    vanDalen, A
    Rinkes, IHMB
    vandenTweel, JG
    Mali, WPTM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 24 (02) : 120 - 123
  • [18] PIJNAPPEL RM, 2002, DIAGNOSIS NONPALPABL
  • [19] Reduction in breast cancer mortality due to the introduction of mass screening in the Netherlands: comparison with the United Kingdom
    van den Akker-van Marle, E
    de Koning, H
    Boer, R
    van der Maas, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1999, 6 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [20] vandenAkkervanMarle ME, 1997, INT J CANCER, V73, P464, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971114)73:4<464::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO