Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultrafiltration and ion-exchange

被引:54
作者
Kowalska, Izabela [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Inst Environm Protect Engn, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
surfactant; ultrafiltration; membrane; ion-exchange; MIEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.094
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 [化学工程与技术];
摘要
The aim of the study was to compare the removal efficiency of anionic surfactant (belonging to alkylbenzenesulfonate family) from water solutions by means of ultrafiltration and ion-exchange. During the first stage of the experiments, the influence of surfactant type and its concentration, membrane cut-off and polymer material on ultrafiltration performance was evaluated. The next stage of the study was focused on effectiveness of ion-exchange using MIEX resin as a method of surfactant removal from water solutions. The effect of pollutant concentration, resin dose, mixing time, pH of the solution and mineral salt presence was assessed. It was noticed that the ultrafiltration separation of surfactant was significantly influenced by membrane material. The best separation characteristics were achieved by polysulfone and polyethersulfone membranes. The PES5 and PS5 ones allowed lower the surfactant concentration to be achieved ranging from 71 to 91% and from 55 to 81% for 5 kDa and 10 kDa. High surfactant retention was obtained at lower concentrations. With the increase in surfactant concentration the retention values decreased with a slight increase in CMC value. From the experimental investigation, the magnetic ion-exchange resin was found to be very effective in anionic surfactant removal in a wide range of concentrations. As well as the ion-exchange process was shown to be insensitive to the pH value of the solution and the mineral salt presence.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Separation of an anionic surfactant by nanofiltration [J].
Archer, AC ;
Mendes, AM ;
Boaventura, RAR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) :2758-2764
[2]
Effect of photochemical treatment on the biocompatibility of a commercial nonionic surfactant used in the textile industry [J].
Arslan-Alaton, Idil ;
Erdinc, Elif .
WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (18) :3409-3418
[3]
Removal of surfactants by powered activated carbon and microfiltration [J].
Basar, CA ;
Karagunduz, A ;
Cakici, A ;
Keskinler, B .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (08) :2117-2124
[4]
Anionic and cationic surfactant recovery from water using a multistage foam fractionator [J].
Boonyasuwat, S ;
Chavadej, S ;
Malakul, P ;
Scamehorn, JF .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 93 (03) :241-252
[5]
Simultaneous uptake of anionic surfactants and micellar-solubilized contaminants using anion-exchange resins [J].
Cheng, HF ;
Sabatini, DA .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (08) :2062-2076
[6]
Biological activity and environmental impact of anionic surfactants [J].
Cserháti, T ;
Forgács, E ;
Oros, G .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 28 (05) :337-348
[7]
Das Purakayastha P, 2005, INDIAN J CHEM TECHN, V12, P281
[8]
Fate of free and linear alcohol-ethoxylate-derived fatty alcohols in activated sludge [J].
Federle, TW ;
Itrich, NR .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2006, 64 (01) :30-41
[9]
Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions [J].
Fernández, E ;
Benito, JM ;
Pazos, C ;
Coca, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 246 (01) :1-6
[10]
GOERS B, 1998, HENKEL REFERATE, V34, P43