Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors

被引:406
作者
Epstein, JN [1 ]
Erkanli, A [1 ]
Conners, CK [1 ]
Klaric, J [1 ]
Costello, JE [1 ]
Angold, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
ADHD; CPT; symptomatology; CPT performance parameters;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025405216339
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a neuropsychological task that has repeatedly been shown to differentiate ADHD from normal groups. Several variables may be derived from the Conners' CPT including errors of omission and commission, mean hit reaction time(RT), mean hit RT standard error, d', and beta. What each CPT parameter actually assesses has largely been based upon clinical assumptions and the face validity of each measure (e.g., omission errors measure inattention, commission errors measure impulsivity). This study attempts to examine relations between various CPT variables and phenotypic behaviors so as to better understand the various CPT variables. An epidemiological sample of 817 children was administered the Conners' CPT. Diagnostic interviews were conducted with parents to determine ADHD symptom profiles for all children. Children diagnosed with ADHD had more variable RTs, made more errors of commission and omission, and demonstrated poorer perceptual sensitivity than nondiagnosed children. Regarding specific symptoms, generalized estimating equations (GEE) and ANCOVAs were conducted to determine specific relationships between the 18 DSM-IV ADHD symptoms and 6 CPT parameters. CPT performance measures demonstrated significant relationships to ADHD symptoms but did not demonstrate symptom domain specificity according to a priori assumptions. Overall performance on the two signal detection measures, d' and beta, was highly related to all ADHD symptoms across symptom domains. Further, increased variability in RTs over time was related to most ADHD symptoms. Finally, it appears that at least 1 CPT variable, mean hit RT, is minimally related to ADHD symptoms as a whole, but does demonstrate some specificity in its link with symptoms of hyperactivity.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 554
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   THE CONSTRUCT SPECIFICITY OF THE CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE-TEST - DOES INATTENTION RELATE TO BEHAVIOR AND ACHIEVEMENT [J].
LASSITER, KS ;
DAMATO, RC ;
RAGGIO, DJ ;
WHITTEN, JCM ;
BARDOS, AN .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 10 (02) :179-188
[22]   Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach [J].
Leth-Steensen, C ;
Elbaz, ZK ;
Douglas, VI .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (02) :167-190
[23]   Error patterns on the continuous performance test in non-medicated and medicated samples of children with and without ADHD: A meta-analytic review [J].
Losier, BJ ;
McGrath, PJ ;
Klein, RM .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 37 (08) :971-987
[24]   THE D' MEASURE OF SIGNAL DETECTABILITY IN VIGILANCE-LIKE SITUATIONS [J].
MACKWORTH, JF ;
TAYLOR, MM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 17 (03) :302-325
[25]   Does the Conners' Continuous Performance Test aid in ADHD diagnosis? [J].
McGee, RA ;
Clark, SE ;
Symons, DK .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 28 (05) :415-424
[26]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159
[27]   HYPERACTIVE AND HYPOXIC CHILDREN - SIGNAL-DETECTION, SUSTAINED ATTENTION, AND BEHAVIOR [J].
ODOUGHERTY, M ;
NUECHTERLEIN, KH ;
DREW, B .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 93 (02) :178-191
[28]   ATTAINING AND MAINTAINING PREPARATION - A COMPARISON OF ATTENTION IN HYPERACTIVE, NORMAL, AND DISTURBED CONTROL CHILDREN [J].
SCHACHAR, R ;
LOGAN, G ;
WACHSMUTH, R ;
CHAJCZYK, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 16 (04) :361-378
[29]   ADDITIVE FACTOR METHOD APPLIED TO PSYCHOPATHOLOGY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CHILDHOOD HYPERACTIVITY [J].
SERGEANT, J ;
VANDERMEERE, J .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1990, 74 (2-3) :277-295
[30]  
Swets John., 1982, EVALUATION DIAGNOSTI