Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury

被引:299
作者
Gioia, GA
Isquith, PK
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Pediat Neuropsychol Program, Childrens Natl Med Ctr,Dept Pediat, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Hanover, NH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15326942dn2501&2_8
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Executive dysfunction is a common outcome in children who have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI). Appropriate assessment of these complex interrelated regulatory functions is critical to plan for the necessary interventions yet present a challenge to our traditional methodologies. Ecological validity has become an increasingly important focus in neuropsychological assessment with particular relevance for the executive functions, which coordinate one's cognitive and behavioral capacities with real-world demand situations. The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) was developed to capture the real-world behavioral manifestations of executive dysfunction. Its development and various forms of validity, including ecological validity, are described. Application of the BRIEF's methodology to the assessment of executive dysfunction in TBI is provided. We advocate a multilevel approach to understanding executive function outcome in TBI, including traditional test-based measures of executive function, real-world behavioral manifestation of executive dysfunction, and the environmental system factors that impact the child. In this model, ecologically valid assessment of executive dysfunction provides an important bridge toward understanding the impact of component-level (i.e., test-based) deficits on the child's everyday adaptive functioning, which can assist the definition of targets for intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 158
页数:24
相关论文
共 89 条
[21]  
Cripe L. I., 1996, Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, P171
[22]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
[23]  
Denckla M.B., 1994, Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues
[24]  
Denckla M.B., 1996, ATTENTION MEMORY EXE, P263
[26]   Appraising and managing knowledge: Metacognitive skills after childhood head injury [J].
Dennis, M ;
Barnes, MA ;
Donnelly, RE ;
Wilkinson, M ;
Humphreys, RP .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 12 (01) :77-103
[27]  
Dennis M, 2000, SCI PRACT NEUROPSYCH, P3
[28]   Attentional-inhibitory control and social-behavioral regulation after childhood closed head injury: Do biological, developmental, and recovery variables predict outcome? [J].
Dennis, M ;
Guger, S ;
Roncadin, C ;
Barnes, M ;
Schachar, R .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 7 (06) :683-692
[29]  
Dunn E J, 1990, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, V5, P103, DOI 10.1016/0887-6177(90)90032-K
[30]   SEVERE DISTURBANCE OF HIGHER COGNITION AFTER BILATERAL FRONTAL-LOBE ABLATION - PATIENT EVR [J].
ESLINGER, PJ ;
DAMASIO, AR .
NEUROLOGY, 1985, 35 (12) :1731-1741