Efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10 mg in a placebo-controlled comparison with loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: results of the MILOR study

被引:26
作者
Dubertret, L
Aguttes, MM
Tonet, J
机构
[1] Synthelabo Grp, F-92355 Le Plessis Robinson, France
[2] Hop St Louis, Dermatol Serv, F-75010 Paris, France
[3] Hop J Rostand, F-94200 Ivry, France
关键词
H-1-antagonists; antihistamines; mizolastine; loratadine; placebo; chronic idiopathic urticaria;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-9959(98)00130-5
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Mizolastine is a novel histamine HI-antagonist registered in Europe for the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Objectives To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of mizolastine with loratadine and placebo in patients with chronic idiopathic urticatia (CIU). Methods A multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study was designed in which 247 patients with CIU were randomised after a 1-week placebo run-in period to 10 mg daily mizolastine (n = 88), 10 mg daily loratadine (n = 79), or placebo (n = 80) for a 4-week treatment period. Results Mizolastine and loratadine both relieved symptoms of CIU. After 2 weeks' treatment, the severity of pruritus (visual analogue score (VAS) assessed by patients) decreased significantly in both the mizolastine and loratadine groups compared with placebo (mizolastine: -36.7 mm, P = 0.0001; loratadine: -29.8, P = 0.0071; placebo: -16.3); this improvement with both active treatments was maintained throughout the treatment period, the difference being significant only for the mizolastine group (P = 0.0090). Both active treatments were also associated with reduced weekly episodes of urticaria compared with placebo. which was significant after 2 weeks' treatment (mizolastine: 7.9 episodes, P = 0.0061; loratadine: 8.3, P = 0.0221; placebo: 13.3). Angioedema was improved to a clinically significant extent with mizolastine, and loratadine compared with placebo in those patients who had this symptom before treatment. Overall tolerability of both treatments was similar to placebo, and there were no clinically relevant effects on cardiac repolarisation with either mizolastine or loratadine. Conclusion Mizolastine (10 mg daily) is confirmed as an effective and well tolerated agent, comparable to loratadine and superior to placebo, for the management of CIU. Mizolastine acted as rapidly as loratadine in improving urticarial symptoms from the first day of treatment. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   SL-85.0324 - A NOVEL BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE WITH SELECTIVE HISTAMINE H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST PROPERTIES [J].
ARBILLA, S ;
SCHOEMAKER, H ;
SCATTON, B ;
BENAVIDES, J ;
CLAUSTRE, Y ;
PROUTEAU, M ;
DELAHAYE, M ;
PIMOULE, C ;
GRAHAM, D ;
MANOURY, P ;
LLOYD, KG ;
WICK, A ;
LANGER, SZ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 183 (02) :222-222
[2]  
BELAICH S, 1990, ANN ALLERGY, V64, P191
[3]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ASTEMIZOLE, A LONG-ACTING AND NONSEDATING H-1 ANTAGONIST FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC URTICARIA [J].
BERNSTEIN, IL ;
BERNSTEIN, DI .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1986, 77 (01) :37-42
[4]  
Brostoff J, 1996, ALLERGY, V51, P320
[5]  
CHAUFOUR S, 1992, ALLERGY S12, V47, P154
[6]   URTICARIA AND ANGIOEDEMA - DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION [J].
COOPER, KD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 25 (01) :166-176
[7]  
CZARNETZKI MB, 1986, URTICARIA, P26
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF THE ANTICHOLINERGIC EFFECT OF THE NEW ANTIHISTAMINE MIZOLASTINE IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS [J].
DANJOU, P ;
MOLINIER, P ;
BERLIN, I ;
PATAT, A ;
ROSENZWEIG, P ;
MORSELLI, PL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 34 (04) :328-331
[9]   H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS - COMPARATIVE TOLERABILITY AND SAFETY [J].
ESTELLE, F ;
SIMONS, R .
DRUG SAFETY, 1994, 10 (05) :350-380
[10]   THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO SEVERE CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC URTICARIA WITH ASTEMIZOLE - DOUBLE-BLIND AND OPEN TRIALS [J].
FOX, RW ;
LOCKEY, RF ;
BUKANTZ, SC ;
SERBOUSEK, D .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1986, 78 (06) :1159-1166