Understanding Affective Organizational Commitment: The Importance of Institutional Context

被引:117
作者
Stazyk, Edmund C. [1 ]
Pandey, Sanjay K. [2 ]
Wright, Bradley E. [3 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs & Adm, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
organizational commitment; affective commitment; goal and role ambiguity; red tape; 3-COMPONENT MODEL; ROLE-CONFLICT; NORMATIVE COMMITMENT; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; WORK MOTIVATION; GOAL AMBIGUITY; RED TAPE; ANTECEDENTS; METAANALYSIS; DISTINCTION;
D O I
10.1177/0275074011398119
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This study proposes and tests a model of affective organizational commitment that seeks to capture aspects of the unique institutional context of public organizations. An analysis of survey data from seven public sector organizations suggests external control increases organizational goal ambiguity and two types of bureaucratic red tape, which, in turn, negatively affects affective commitment. Although personnel red tape has a direct adverse impact on affective commitment, procurement red tape is not found to have a significant effect. Organizational goal ambiguity's influence on affective organizational commitment, however, is mediated through its effect on centralization and role ambiguity. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of these relationships and possible explanations for instances when findings are not consistent with expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 624
页数:22
相关论文
共 109 条
[11]   The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda [J].
Bergman, Mindy E. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2006, 27 (05) :645-663
[12]   RED TAPE AND TASK DELAYS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BOZEMAN, B ;
REED, PN ;
SCOTT, P .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1992, 24 (03) :290-322
[13]  
Bozeman B., 1987, ALL ORG ARE PUBLIC B
[14]  
Bozeman B., 2000, Bureaucracy and red tape
[15]  
Bozeman B., 1994, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, P197, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A037204
[16]  
Bozeman B., 1993, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V3, P273, DOI [10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037171, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A037171]
[17]  
Brynard D.J., 1995, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V8, P38
[18]   GOVERNMENT MANAGERS, BUSINESS EXECUTIVES, AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT [J].
BUCHANAN, B .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1974, 34 (04) :339-347
[19]   Goal ambiguity in US Federal Agencies [J].
Chun, YH ;
Rainey, HG .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2005, 15 (01) :1-30
[20]  
Cohen A. M., 2003, AM COMMUNITY COLL