Limiting amounts of budding yeast Rad53 S-phase checkpoint activity results in increased resistance to DNA alkylation damage

被引:20
作者
Cordon-Preciado, Violeta [1 ]
Ufano, Sandra [1 ]
Bueno, Avelino [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, CSIC, Dept Genet & Microbiol, Inst Biol Mol & Celular Canc, E-37007 Salamanca, Spain
关键词
REDUCTASE INHIBITOR SML1; CELL-CYCLE; RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASE; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; REPLICATION ORIGINS; FORK PROGRESSION; IN-VIVO; KINASE; PROTEIN; MEC1;
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkl741
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
070307 [化学生物学]; 071010 [生物化学与分子生物学];
摘要
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein kinase Rad53 plays a key role in maintaining genomic integrity after DNA damage and is an essential component of the 'intra-S-phase checkpoint'. In budding yeast, alkylating chemicals, such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), or depletion of nucleotides by hydroxyurea (HU) stall DNA replication forks and thus activate Rad53 during S-phase. This stabilizes stalled DNA replication forks and prevents the activation of later origins of DNA replication. Here, we report that a reduction in the level of Rad53 kinase causes cells to behave very differently in response to DNA alkylation or to nucleotide depletion. While cells lacking Rad53 are unable to activate the checkpoint response to HU or MMS, so that they rapidly lose viability, a reduction in Rad53 enhances cell survival only after DNA alkylation. This reduction in the level of Rad53 allows S-phase cells to maintain the stability of DNA replication forks upon MMS treatment, but does not prevent the collapse of forks in HU. Our results may have important implications for cancer therapies, as they suggest that partial impairment of the S-phase checkpoint Rad53/Chk2 kinase provides cells with a growth advantage in the presence of drugs that damage DNA.
引用
收藏
页码:5852 / 5862
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
THE SAD1/RAD53 PROTEIN-KINASE CONTROLS MULTIPLE CHECKPOINTS AND DNA DAMAGE-INDUCED TRANSCRIPTION IN YEAST [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
ZHOU, Z ;
SIEDE, W ;
FRIEDBERG, EC ;
ELLEDGE, SJ .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 8 (20) :2401-2415
[2]
Checking on DNA damage in S phase [J].
Bartek, J ;
Lukas, C ;
Lukas, J .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (10) :792-804
[3]
Basrai MA, 1999, MOL CELL BIOL, V19, P7041
[4]
DISTRIBUTION OF METHYL AND ETHYL ADDUCTS FOLLOWING ALKYLATION WITH MONOFUNCTIONAL ALKYLATING-AGENTS [J].
BERANEK, DT .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 231 (01) :11-30
[5]
Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome eukaryotic DNA at a paused replication fork [J].
Calzada, A ;
Hodgson, B ;
Kanemaki, M ;
Bueno, A ;
Labib, K .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 19 (16) :1905-1919
[6]
ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones [J].
Cha, RS ;
Kleckner, N .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5581) :602-606
[7]
Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants [J].
Chen, C ;
Kolodner, RD .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 23 (01) :81-85
[8]
Redundancy, insult-specific sensors and thresholds: unlocking the S-phase checkpoint response [J].
Cobb, JA ;
Shimada, K ;
Gasser, SM .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 14 (03) :292-300
[9]
Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway [J].
Desany, BA ;
Alcasabas, AA ;
Bachant, JB ;
Elledge, SJ .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 12 (18) :2956-2970
[10]
DNA DAMAGE INDUCTION OF RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASE [J].
ELLEDGE, SJ ;
DAVIS, RW .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1989, 9 (11) :4932-4940