Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease - A systematic review of tools for clinicians

被引:145
作者
Sheridan, S
Pignone, M
Mulrow, C
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Gen Internal Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Med, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
risk assessment; coronary heart disease; Framingham Heart Study;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30107.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: To examine the features of available Framingham-based risk calculation tools and review their accuracy and feasibility in clinical practice. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, 1966-April 2003, and the GOOGLE search engine on the Internet. TOOL AND STUDY SELECTION: We included risk calculation tools that used the Framingham risk equations to generate a global coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. To determine tool accuracy, we reviewed all articles that compared the performance of various Framingham-based risk tools to that of the continuous Framingham risk equations. To determine the feasibility of tool use in clinical practice, we reviewed articles on the availability of the risk factor information required for risk calculation, subjective preference for 1 risk calculator over another, or subjective ease of use. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently reviewed the results of the literature search, all websites, and abstracted all articles for relevant information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Multiple CHD risk calculation tools are available, including risk charts and computerized calculators for personal digital assistants, personal computers, and web-based use. Most are easy to use and available without cost. They require information on age, smoking status, blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, and the presence or absence of diabetes. Compared to the full Framingham equations, accuracy for identifying patients at increased risk was generally quite high. Data on the feasibility of tool use was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Several easy-to-use tools are available for estimating patients' CHD risk. Use of such tools could facilitate better decision making about interventions for primary prevention of CHD, but further research about their actual effect on clinical practice and patient outcomes is required. DISCLOSURE: Drs. Sheridan and Pignone have participated in the development of Heart-to-Heart, one of the risk tools evaluated within. They have also received speaking and consulting fees from Bayer, Inc. Bayer, Inc. has licensed the Heart-to-Heart tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1052
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]   Differences in generalists' and cardiologists' perceptions of cardiovascular risk and the outcomes of preventive therapy in cardiovascular disease [J].
Friedmann, PD ;
Brett, AS ;
MayoSmith, MF .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 124 (04) :414-+
[12]   Comparative accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction methods in patients with diabetes mellitus [J].
Game, FL ;
Bartlett, WA ;
Bayly, GR ;
Jones, AF .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2001, 3 (04) :279-286
[13]   Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people - Role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests [J].
Greenland, P ;
Smith, SC ;
Grundy, SM .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (15) :1863-1867
[14]   DO DOCTORS ACCURATELY ASSESS CORONARY RISK IN THEIR PATIENTS - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF THE CORONARY HEALTH ASSESSMENT STUDY [J].
GROVER, SA ;
LOWENSTEYN, I ;
ESREY, KL ;
STEINERT, Y ;
JOSEPH, L ;
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6985) :975-978
[15]   Cardiovascular risk assessment based on US cohort studies - Findings from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop [J].
Grundy, SM ;
D'Agostino, RB ;
Mosca, L ;
Burke, GL ;
Wilson, PWF ;
Rader, DJ ;
Cleeman, JI ;
Roccella, EJ ;
Cutler, JA ;
Friedman, LM .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (04) :491-496
[16]   Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations - A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology [J].
Grundy, SM ;
Pasternak, R ;
Greenland, P ;
Smith, S ;
Fuster, V .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (13) :1481-1492
[17]   Controlled trial of effect of documented cardiovascular risk scores on prescribing [J].
Hall, LML ;
Jung, RT ;
Leese, GP .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7383) :251-252
[18]   Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Hayden, M ;
Pignone, M ;
Phillips, C ;
Mulrow, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (02) :161-172
[19]   Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods [J].
Isles, CG ;
Ritchie, LD ;
Murchie, P ;
Norrie, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7236) :690-691
[20]   Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide [J].
Jackson, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7236) :709-710