The active magnetic resonance imaging stent (AMRIS) - Initial experimental in vivo results with locally amplified MR angiography and flow measurements

被引:14
作者
Kivelitz, D
Wagner, S
Hansel, J
Schnorr, J
Wetzler, R
Busch, M
Melzer, A
Taupitz, M
Hamm, B
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Radiol, Charite, Fak Med, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
[2] Simag GmbH, Berlin, Germany
关键词
stents; MR imaging; magnetic resonance angiography; aorta;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-200111000-00001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Magnetic resonance (MR) is limited by artifacts in vessels after stenting. An active MR imaging stent (AMRIS) allows for artifact-free imaging with local improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a rabbit model, we evaluated the imaging properties by MR angiography (MRA) and flow measurements. METHODS. The AMRIS was placed in the abdominal aorta of five rabbits. At 1.5 T, MRA (three-dimensional fast low-angle shot) was performed before and after intravenous injection of an iron oxide-based, blood-pool contrast medium (dose, 50 mu mol Fe/kg), and flow measurements were performed (electrocardiographically triggered phase-contrast cine gradient-echo sequence). Mean SNRs were calculated and flow volume curves were generated. RESULTS. The SNR was 6.0 +/- 0.6 (outside the stent) versus 12.3 +/- 1.1 (inside the stent, P < 0.05) for plain MRA, 21.2 +/- 0.6 versus 40.6 +/- 5.2 (P < 0.05) for contrast-enhanced MRA, and 5.4 +/- 0.4 versus 13.7 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.05) for the magnitude images of flow measurements. Flow volume curves within and distal to the stent were comparable. CONCLUSIONS. By using the AMRIS as a vascular stent, the stented vessel segment can be examined with enhanced signal intensity on MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 631
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Safety and efficacy of ticlopidine for only 2 weeks after successful intracoronary stent placement [J].
Berger, PB ;
Bell, MR ;
Hasdai, D ;
Grill, DE ;
Melby, S ;
Holmes, DR .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (02) :248-253
[2]   Advanced MR imaging techniques for evaluation of the heart and great vessels [J].
Boxerman, JL ;
Mosher, TJ ;
McVeigh, ER ;
Atalar, E ;
Lima, JAC ;
Bluemke, DA .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (03) :543-564
[3]  
Duerinckx AJ, 1996, EUR RADIOL, V6, P312
[4]   Assessment of coronary artery patency after stent placement using magnetic resonance angiography [J].
Duerinckx, AJ ;
Atkinson, D ;
Hurwitz, R .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 8 (04) :896-902
[5]   MAXIMIZING CONTRAST TO NOISE WITH INDUCTIVELY COUPLED IMPLANTED COILS [J].
FARMER, THR ;
COFER, GP ;
JOHNSON, GA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (05) :552-558
[6]  
Fenyes DA, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P300, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199908)42:2<300::AID-MRM12>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-9
[8]   A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CORONARY-STENT PLACEMENT AND BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY IN THE TREATMENT OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
FISCHMAN, DL ;
LEON, MB ;
BAIM, DS ;
SCHATZ, RA ;
SAVAGE, MP ;
PENN, I ;
DETRE, K ;
VELTRI, L ;
RICCI, D ;
NOBUYOSHI, M ;
CLEMAN, M ;
HEUSER, R ;
ALMOND, D ;
TEIRSTEIN, PS ;
FISH, RD ;
COLOMBO, A ;
BRINKER, J ;
MOSES, J ;
SHAKNOVICH, A ;
HIRSHFELD, J ;
BAILEY, S ;
ELLIS, S ;
RAKE, R ;
GOLDBERG, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (08) :496-501
[9]  
Fontaine AB, 1996, J ENDOVASC SURG, V3, P276, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0276:PSMOTS>2.0.CO
[10]  
2