The active magnetic resonance imaging stent (AMRIS) - Initial experimental in vivo results with locally amplified MR angiography and flow measurements

被引:14
作者
Kivelitz, D
Wagner, S
Hansel, J
Schnorr, J
Wetzler, R
Busch, M
Melzer, A
Taupitz, M
Hamm, B
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Radiol, Charite, Fak Med, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
[2] Simag GmbH, Berlin, Germany
关键词
stents; MR imaging; magnetic resonance angiography; aorta;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-200111000-00001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Magnetic resonance (MR) is limited by artifacts in vessels after stenting. An active MR imaging stent (AMRIS) allows for artifact-free imaging with local improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a rabbit model, we evaluated the imaging properties by MR angiography (MRA) and flow measurements. METHODS. The AMRIS was placed in the abdominal aorta of five rabbits. At 1.5 T, MRA (three-dimensional fast low-angle shot) was performed before and after intravenous injection of an iron oxide-based, blood-pool contrast medium (dose, 50 mu mol Fe/kg), and flow measurements were performed (electrocardiographically triggered phase-contrast cine gradient-echo sequence). Mean SNRs were calculated and flow volume curves were generated. RESULTS. The SNR was 6.0 +/- 0.6 (outside the stent) versus 12.3 +/- 1.1 (inside the stent, P < 0.05) for plain MRA, 21.2 +/- 0.6 versus 40.6 +/- 5.2 (P < 0.05) for contrast-enhanced MRA, and 5.4 +/- 0.4 versus 13.7 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.05) for the magnitude images of flow measurements. Flow volume curves within and distal to the stent were comparable. CONCLUSIONS. By using the AMRIS as a vascular stent, the stented vessel segment can be examined with enhanced signal intensity on MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 631
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Three-dimensional MR coronary angiography using the navigator technique compared with conventional coronary angiography [J].
Sandstede, JJW ;
Pabst, T ;
Beer, M ;
Geis, N ;
Kenn, W ;
Neubauer, S ;
Hahn, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (01) :135-139
[32]   FEMOROPOPLITEAL STENT PLACEMENT - LONG-TERM RESULTS [J].
SAPOVAL, MR ;
LONG, AL ;
RAYNAUD, AC ;
BEYSSEN, BM ;
FIESSINGER, JN ;
GAUX, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :833-839
[33]   WIRELESS IMPLANTED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE PROBES FOR INVIVO NMR [J].
SCHNALL, MD ;
BARLOW, C ;
SUBRAMANIAN, VH ;
LEIGH, JS .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1986, 68 (01) :161-167
[34]   A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents [J].
Schomig, A ;
Neumann, FJ ;
Kastrati, A ;
Schuhlen, H ;
Blasini, R ;
Hadamitzky, M ;
Walter, H ;
ZitzmannRoth, EM ;
Richardt, G ;
Alt, E ;
Schmitt, C ;
Ulm, K .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (17) :1084-1089
[35]   Intracoronary stenting and risk for major adverse cardiac events during the first month [J].
Schühlen, H ;
Kastrati, A ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Hausleiter, J ;
Elezi, S ;
Wehinger, A ;
Pache, J ;
Hadamitzky, M ;
Schömig, A .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (02) :104-111
[36]   Metallic stents: Evaluation of MR imaging safety [J].
Shellock, FG ;
Shellock, VJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) :543-547
[37]   Flexible tantalum stents for the treatment of iliac artery lesions: Long-term patency, complications, and risk factors [J].
Strecker, EP ;
Boos, IBL ;
Hagen, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (03) :641-647
[38]   Safety of implantable coronary stents during 1H-magnetic resonance imaging at 1.0 and 1.5 T [J].
Strohm, O ;
Kivelitz, D ;
Gross, W ;
Schulz-Menger, J ;
Liu, XM ;
Hamm, B ;
Dietz, R ;
Friedrich, MG .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1999, 1 (03) :239-245
[39]   MR MICROSCOPY OF THE RAT CAROTID-ARTERY AFTER BALLOON INJURY BY USING AN IMPLANTED IMAGING COIL [J].
SUMMERS, RM ;
HEDLUND, LW ;
COFER, GP ;
GOTTSMAN, MB ;
MANIBO, JF ;
JOHNSON, GA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (06) :785-789
[40]  
Taupitz M, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P905, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<905::AID-JMRI14>3.0.CO