Determinants of Strain-Specific Differences in Efficiency of Reovirus Entry

被引:24
作者
Sarkar, Payel [1 ]
Danthi, Pranav [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
CAPSID PROTEIN MU-1; INFECTIOUS SUBVIRION PARTICLES; FLOCK HOUSE VIRUS; MEDIATES MEMBRANE DISRUPTION; REVERSE GENETICS SYSTEM; L-CELLS; MATURATION CLEAVAGE; NONENVELOPED VIRUS; MAMMALIAN REOVIRUSES; PUTATIVE AUTOCLEAVAGE;
D O I
10.1128/JVI.01385-10
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Cell entry of reovirus requires a series of ordered steps, which include conformational changes in outer capsid protein mu 1 and its autocleavage. The mu 1N fragment released as a consequence of these events interacts with host cell membranes and mediates their disruption, leading to delivery of the viral core into the cytoplasm. The prototype reovirus strains T1L and T3D exhibit differences in the efficiency of autocleavage, in the propensity to undergo conformational changes required for membrane penetration, and in the capacity for penetrating host cell membranes. To better understand how polymorphic differences in mu 1 influence reovirus entry events, we generated recombinant viruses that express chimeric T1L-T3D mu 1 proteins and characterized them for the capacity to efficiently complete each step required for membrane penetration. Our studies revealed two important functions for the central delta region of mu 1. First, we found that mu 1 autocleavage is regulated by the N-terminal portion of delta, which forms an alpha-helical pedestal structure. Second, we observed that the C-terminal portion of delta, which forms a jelly-roll beta barrel structure, regulates membrane penetration by influencing the efficiency of ISVP* formation. Thus, our studies highlight the molecular basis for differences in the membrane penetration efficiency displayed by prototype reovirus strains and suggest that distinct portions of the reovirus delta domain influence different steps during entry.
引用
收藏
页码:12723 / 12732
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Mammalian reovirus, a nonfusogenic nonenveloped virus, forms size-selective pores in a model membrane [J].
Agosto, Melina A. ;
Ivanovic, Tijana ;
Nibert, Max L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (44) :16496-16501
[2]   Interaction of poliovirus with its purified receptor and conformational alteration in the virion [J].
Arita, M ;
Koike, S ;
Aoki, J ;
Horie, H ;
Nomoto, A .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 1998, 72 (05) :3578-3586
[3]   Mutations in reovirus outer-capsid protein sigma 3 selected during persistent infections of L cells confer resistance to protease inhibitor E64 [J].
Baer, GS ;
Dermody, TS .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 1997, 71 (07) :4921-4928
[4]  
Banerjee M, 2008, CURR PROTEIN PEPT SC, V9, P16
[5]   Utilization of sialic acid as a coreceptor enhances reovirus attachment by multistep adhesion strengthening [J].
Barton, ES ;
Connolly, JL ;
Forrest, JC ;
Chappell, JD ;
Dermody, TS .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (03) :2200-2211
[6]   Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus [J].
Barton, ES ;
Forrest, JC ;
Connolly, JL ;
Chappell, JD ;
Liu, Y ;
Schnell, FJ ;
Nusrat, A ;
Parkos, CA ;
Dermody, TS .
CELL, 2001, 104 (03) :441-451
[7]   ROLE AND MECHANISM OF THE MATURATION CLEAVAGE OF VPO IN POLIOVIRUS ASSEMBLY - STRUCTURE OF THE EMPTY CAPSID ASSEMBLY INTERMEDIATE AT 2.9-ANGSTROM RESOLUTION [J].
BASAVAPPA, R ;
SYED, R ;
FLORE, O ;
ICENOGLE, JP ;
FILMAN, DJ ;
HOGLE, JM .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1994, 3 (10) :1651-1669
[8]   A highly membrane-active peptide in Flock House virus: implications for the mechanism of nodavirus infection [J].
Bong, DT ;
Steinem, C ;
Janshoff, A ;
Johnson, JE ;
Ghadiri, MR .
CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (07) :473-481
[9]   2 MODES OF ENTRY OF REOVIRUS PARTICLES INTO L-CELLS [J].
BORSA, J ;
MORASH, BD ;
SARGENT, MD ;
COPPS, TP ;
LIEVAART, PA ;
SZEKELY, JG .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1979, 45 (OCT) :161-170
[10]   REOVIRUS - EVIDENCE FOR A 2ND STEP IN THE INTRACELLULAR UNCOATING AND TRANSCRIPTASE ACTIVATION PROCESS [J].
BORSA, J ;
SARGENT, MD ;
LIEVAART, PA ;
COPPS, TP .
VIROLOGY, 1981, 111 (01) :191-200