Individual differences and the neural representations of reward expectation and reward prediction error

被引:53
作者
Cohen, Michael X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Epilepsy, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Neurosci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
reward prediction error; reward expectation; fMRI; decision-making; reinforcement learning; risk-taking;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsl021
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reward expectation and reward prediction errors are thought to be critical for dynamic adjustments in decision-making and reward-seeking behavior, but little is known about their representation in the brain during uncertainty and risk-taking. Furthermore, little is known about what role individual differences might play in such reinforcement processes. In this study, it is shown behavioral and neural responses during a decision-making task can be characterized by a computational reinforcement learning model and that individual differences in learning parameters in the model are critical for elucidating these processes. In the fMRI experiment, subjects chose between high- and low-risk rewards. A computational reinforcement learning model computed expected values and prediction errors that each subject might experience on each trial. These outputs predicted subjects' trial-to-trial choice strategies and neural activity in several limbic and prefrontal regions during the task. Individual differences in estimated reinforcement learning parameters proved critical for characterizing these processes, because models that incorporated individual learning parameters explained significantly more variance in the fMRI data than did a model using fixed learning parameters. These findings suggest that the brain engages a reinforcement learning process during risk-taking and that individual differences play a crucial role in modeling this process.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Behavioral and neural predictors of upcoming decisions [J].
Cohen, MX ;
Ranganath, C .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 5 (02) :117-126
[12]  
COHEN MX, IN PRESS REINFORCEME
[13]   PERSONALITY-CHARACTERISTICS OF HEROIN-ADDICTS - REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE WITH CRITIQUE .2. [J].
CRAIG, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1979, 14 (05) :607-626
[14]   Opponent interactions between serotonin and dopamine [J].
Daw, ND ;
Kakade, S ;
Dayan, P .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2002, 15 (4-6) :603-616
[15]   Gender, occupational, and socioeconomic correlates of alcohol and drug abuse among US rural, metropolitan, and urban residents [J].
Diala, CC ;
Muntaner, C ;
Walrath, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2004, 30 (02) :409-428
[16]   THE BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA VENTRAL STRIATAL SYSTEM AND CONDITIONED PLACE PREFERENCE - FURTHER EVIDENCE OF LIMBIC STRIATAL INTERACTIONS UNDERLYING REWARD-RELATED PROCESSES [J].
EVERITT, BJ ;
MORRIS, KA ;
OBRIEN, A ;
ROBBINS, TW .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1991, 42 (01) :1-18
[17]   The role of the amygdala in conditioned flavor preference [J].
Gilbert, PE ;
Campbell, AM ;
Kesner, RP .
NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2003, 79 (01) :118-121
[18]   Formal learning theory dissociates brain regions with different temporal integration [J].
Gläscher, J ;
Büchel, C ;
Nord, N .
NEURON, 2005, 47 (02) :295-306
[19]   Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands [J].
Gold, JI ;
Shadlen, MN .
NATURE, 2000, 404 (6776) :390-394
[20]   Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses [J].
Handwerker, DA ;
Ollinger, JM ;
D'Esposito, M .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 21 (04) :1639-1651