Psychosocial aspects of closed-and open-loop insulin delivery: closing the loop in adults with Type 1 diabetes in the home setting

被引:83
作者
Barnard, K. D. [1 ]
Wysocki, T. [2 ]
Thabit, H. [4 ,5 ]
Evans, M. L. [4 ,5 ]
Amiel, S. [6 ,7 ]
Heller, S. [8 ]
Young, A. [3 ]
Hovorka, R.
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, HDH, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] Nemours Childrens Hlth Syst, Ctr Hlth Care Delivery Sci, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Univ Southampton, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Evaluat Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr NETSCC, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Wellcome Trust MRC Inst Metab Sci, Cambridge, England
[5] NIHR Cambridge Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge, England
[6] Univ London, Kings Coll London, Div Diabet & Nutr Sci, London SW3 6LX, England
[7] Kings Coll Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[8] Univ Sheffield, Dept Human Metab, Sch Med & Biosci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
OVERNIGHT GLUCOSE CONTROL; ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
AimsTo explore the psychosocial experiences of closed-loop technology and to compare ratings of closed- and open-loop technology for adults with Type 1 diabetes taking part in a randomized crossover study. MethodsAdults (aged >18 years) on insulin pump therapy were recruited to receive a first phase of either real-time continuous glucose monitoring with overnight closed-loop or real-time continuous glucose monitoring alone (open-loop) followed by a second phase of the alternative treatment in random order, at home for 4 weeks, unsupervised. Participants were invited to share their views in semi-structured interviews. The impact of the closed-loop technology, positive and negative aspects of living with the device overnight, along with the hopes and anxieties of the participants, were explored. ResultsThe participants in the trial were 24 adults with a mean (sd) age of 43 (12) years, of whom 54% were men. The mean (range) interview duration was 26 (12-46) min. Content and thematic analysis showed the following key positive themes: improved blood glucose control (n=16); reassurance/reduced worry (n=16); improved overnight control leading to improved daily functioning and diabetes control (n=16); and improved sleep (n=8). The key negative themes were: technical difficulties (n=24); intrusiveness of alarms (n=13); and size of equipment (n=7). Of the 24 participant, 20 would recommend the closed-loop technology. ConclusionsClosed-loop therapy has positive effects when it works in freeing participants from the demands of self-management. The downside was technical difficulties, particularly concerning the pump and connectivity', which it is hoped will improve. Future research should continue to explore the acceptability of the closed-loop system as a realistic therapy option, taking account of user concerns as new systems are designed. Failure to do this may reduce the eventual utility of new systems. What's new? Closed-loop technology has specific psychosocial benefits supporting optimum self-management in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Advances in technology are associated with greater usability, but further development work is necessary to improve connectivity. Future research is required to determine the holistic impact of closed-loop as a realistic therapy choice for people with Type 1 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 608
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Systematic literature review: quality of life associated with insulin pump use in Type 1 diabetes [J].
Barnard, K. D. ;
Lloyd, C. E. ;
Skinner, T. C. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2007, 24 (06) :607-617
[2]
Fear of hypoglycaemia in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review [J].
Barnard, Katharine ;
Thomas, Sian ;
Royle, Pamela ;
Noyes, Kathryn ;
Waugh, Norman .
BMC PEDIATRICS, 2010, 10
[3]
Closing the loop overnight at home setting: psychosocial impact for adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents [J].
Barnard, Katharine D. ;
Wysocki, Tim ;
Allen, Janet M. ;
Elleri, Daniela ;
Thabit, Hood ;
Leelarathna, Lalantha ;
Gulati, Arti ;
Nodale, Marianna ;
Dunger, David B. ;
Tinati, Tannaze ;
Hovorka, Roman .
BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2014, 2 (01)
[4]
Factors Predictive of Use and of Benefit From Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes [J].
Beck, Roy W. ;
Buckingham, Bruce ;
Miller, Kellee ;
Wolpert, Howard ;
Xing, Dongyuan ;
Block, Jennifer M. ;
Chase, H. Peter ;
Hirsch, Irl ;
Kollman, Craig ;
Laffel, Lori ;
Lawrence, Jean M. ;
Milaszewski, Kerry ;
Ruedy, Katrina J. ;
Tamborlane, William V. .
DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 (11) :1947-1953
[5]
The Barrier of Hypoglycemia in Diabetes [J].
Cryer, Philip E. .
DIABETES, 2008, 57 (12) :3169-3176
[6]
Overnight Closed- Loop Insulin Delivery in Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free- Living, Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Hovorka, Roman ;
Elleri, Daniela ;
Thabit, Hood ;
Allen, Janet M. ;
Leelarathna, Lalantha ;
El-Khairi, Ranna ;
Kumareswaran, Kavita ;
Caldwell, Karen ;
Calhoun, Peter ;
Kollman, Craig ;
Murphy, Helen R. ;
Acerini, Carlo L. ;
Wilinska, Malgorzata E. ;
Nodale, Marianna ;
Dunger, David B. .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (05) :1204-1211
[7]
Overnight Glucose Control With an Automated, Unified Safety System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp [J].
Ly, Trang T. ;
Breton, Marc D. ;
Keith-Hynes, Patrick ;
De Salvo, Daniel ;
Clinton, Paula ;
Benassi, Kari ;
Mize, Benton ;
Chernavvsky, Daniel ;
Place, Jerome ;
Wilson, Darrell M. ;
Kovatchev, Boris P. ;
Buckingham, Bruce A. .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (08) :2310-2316
[8]
Neuendorf K., 2002, CONTENT ANAL GUIDEBO, DOI DOI 10.3917/JIE.032.0075
[9]
Night glucose control with MD-Logic artificial pancreas in home setting: a single blind, randomized crossover trial-interim analysis [J].
Nimri, Revital ;
Muller, Ido ;
Atlas, Eran ;
Miller, Shahar ;
Kordonouri, Olga ;
Bratina, Natasa ;
Tsioli, Christiana ;
Stefanija, Magdalena A. ;
Danne, Thomas ;
Battelino, Tadej ;
Phillip, Moshe .
PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2014, 15 (02) :91-99
[10]
Oliver N, 2014, DIABETES CARE, V37, P11917