Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: Importance of pressure recovery

被引:48
作者
Heinrich, RS
Fontaine, AA
Grimes, RY
Sidhaye, A
Yang, S
Moore, KE
Levine, RA
Yoganathan, AP
机构
[1] GEORGIA INST TECHNOL,SCH CHEM ENGN,CARDIOVASC FLUID MECH LAB,ATLANTA,GA 30332
[2] GEORGIA INST TECHNOL,SCH MECH ENGN,ATLANTA,GA 30332
[3] GEORGIA INST TECHNOL,INST BIOENGN & BIOSCI,ATLANTA,GA 30332
[4] HARVARD UNIV,MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT MED,NONINVAS CARDIAC LAB,BOSTON,MA
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; control volume; conservation of energy; Medtronic-Hall; St Jude;
D O I
10.1007/BF02684181
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r(2) = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r(2) = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r(2) = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 694
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AM HEART ASS, 1994, HEART STROK FACTS 19, P1
[2]   DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DOPPLER AND CATHETER GRADIENTS IN AORTIC PROSTHETIC VALVES INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF LOCALIZED GRADIENTS AND PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
KHAN, S ;
DEROBERTIS, M ;
CZER, L ;
MAURER, G .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) :1467-1475
[3]  
BERNE RM, 1986, CARDIAC PHYSL, P1
[4]   FLOW DEPENDENCE OF MEASURES OF AORTIC-STENOSIS SEVERITY DURING EXERCISE [J].
BURWASH, IG ;
PEARLMAN, AS ;
KRAFT, CD ;
MIYAKEHULL, C ;
HEALY, NL ;
OTTO, CM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (05) :1342-1350
[5]   AORTIC-VALVE RESISTANCE AS AN ADJUNCT TO THE GORLIN FORMULA IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF AORTIC-STENOSIS IN SYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS [J].
CANNON, JD ;
ZILE, MR ;
CRAWFORD, FA ;
CARABELLO, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (07) :1517-1523
[6]   INADEQUACY OF THE GORLIN FORMULA FOR PREDICTING PROSTHETIC VALVE AREA [J].
CANNON, SR ;
RICHARDS, KL ;
CRAWFORD, MH ;
FOLLAND, ED ;
PIERPONT, G ;
SETHI, GK ;
HAMMERMEISTER, KE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 62 (01) :113-116
[7]   FLUID-MECHANICS OF AORTIC-STENOSIS .1. THEORY AND STEADY FLOW EXPERIMENTS [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1976, 9 (08) :521-528
[8]   FLUID-MECHANICS OF AORTIC-STENOSIS .2. UNSTEADY-FLOW EXPERIMENTS [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1976, 9 (09) :567-&
[9]   ENERGY-LOSSES IN FLOW THROUGH STENOSED VALVES [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1979, 12 (10) :737-746
[10]  
Gentle C. R., 1978, Engineering in Medicine, V7, P101, DOI 10.1243/EMED_JOUR_1978_007_025_02