On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return

被引:167
作者
Lupiáñez, J
Milliken, B
Solano, C
Weaver, B
Tipper, SP
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Psicol, Dept Psicol Expt & Fisiol Comportamiento, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Pontificia Univ Javeriana Santa Fe Bogota, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Univ Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2001年 / 54卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02724980042000453
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In studies of exogenous attentional orienting, response times for targets at previously cued locations are often longer than those for targets at previously uncued locations. This effect is known widely as inhibition of return (IOR). There has been debate as to whether IOR can be observed in discrimination as well as detection tasks. The experiments reported here confirm that IOR can be observed when target discrimination is required and that the cue-target interval at which IOR is observed is often longer in discrimination than in detection tasks. The results also demonstrate that the later emergence of IOR is related to perceptual discrimination rather than to response selection differences between discrimination and detection tasks. More difficult discrimination tasks lengthen the SOA at which IOR emerges. In contrast, increasing task difficulty by adding a distractor to the location opposite the target shortens the SOA at which IOR emerges. Together, the results reveal an adaptive interaction between exogenous and endogenous attentional systems, in which the action of the orienting (exogenous) system is modulated endogenously in accord with task demands.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 773
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   MICRO EXPERIMENTAL LABORATORY - AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR IBM PC COMPATIBLES [J].
SCHNEIDER, W .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1988, 20 (02) :206-217
[32]   Location vs feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions [J].
Tanaka, Y ;
Shimojo, S .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (14) :2125-2140
[33]   On the causes and effects of inhibition of return [J].
Taylor, TL ;
Klein, RM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1998, 5 (04) :625-643
[34]  
TERRY KM, 1994, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V55, P323
[35]   FEATURE-INTEGRATION THEORY OF ATTENTION [J].
TREISMAN, AM ;
GELADE, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (01) :97-136