Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production from plasma gasification of sewage sludge using specific exergy cost method

被引:48
作者
Kalinci, Yildiz [2 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Izmir Vocat High Sch, Dept Tech Programs, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen production; Plasma gasification; Energy; Exergy; Exergoeconomics; Efficiency; BIOMASS; GASIFIER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.124
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The plasma gasification process appears to be a relatively new technology due to its better efficiency, effectiveness and environmental friendliness. The process can essentially be used for sewage sludge treatment and energy production. In this paper, we investigate a plasma gasification process from the literature for hydrogen production analysis purposes. We use the specific exergy cost (SPECO) method to calculate exergy-related parameters and display cost flows for all streams and components. We also determine exergy destructions and their costs in a more specific form as avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions. We consider six main components: a plasma gasification furnace, a gas cleaning, syngas compressor, two heat exchangers and a pressure swing adsorption (PSA). We calculate that the PSA has the largest exergy destruction rates with 11.66 MW, followed by the plasma gasification components with 6.55 MW. We also determine exergy efficiencies for these components. The lowest exergy efficiency is 4.43% for the PSA. It is found that the maximum exergy destruction cost rates are 338.75 and 46.92 $/h, for the PSA and plasma gasification furnace, respectively, while the unit cost of hydrogen is 208.6$/h at the outlet of the PSA. We further investigate exergy destruction rates and investment cost rates through an extended exergy analysis and obtain that for the plasma gasification furnace, the avoidable destruction and investment costs are 15.36 and 8.06 $/h, respectively. Copyright (C) 2010, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11408 / 11417
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Baidoo RR, 2009, COGENERATION DISTRIB, V24, P51
[2]   Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined heat and power (CHP) system [J].
Balli, Ozgur ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (04) :273-289
[3]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[4]   A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels [J].
Channiwala, SA ;
Parikh, PP .
FUEL, 2002, 81 (08) :1051-1063
[5]   Hydrogen generation from biogas reforming using a gliding arc plasma-catalyst reformer [J].
Chun, Young. N. ;
Yang, Yoon C. ;
Yoshikawa, K. .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2009, 148 (3-4) :283-289
[6]   Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification [J].
Cohce, M. K. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Rosen, M. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) :4970-4980
[7]   Should biomass be used for power generation or hydrogen production? [J].
Corradetti, Alessandro ;
Desideri, Umberto .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2007, 129 (03) :629-636
[8]   Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainty analysis [J].
Dogru, M ;
Midilli, A ;
Howarth, CR .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 75 (01) :55-82
[9]   HEATING VALUE OF MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE [J].
FINET, C .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 1987, 5 (02) :141-145
[10]   Hydrogen production by coal plasma gasification for fuel cell technology [J].
Galvita, V. ;
Messerle, V. E. ;
Ustimenko, A. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (16) :3899-3906