Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers' response preferences

被引:90
作者
Beghetto, Ronald A. [1 ]
机构
[1] 5277 Univ Oregon, Coll Educ, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Creativity; Teaching for creativity; Teacher development;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2006.09.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine prospective middle and secondary teachers' preferences for unique versus relevant student responses during classroom discussions. Results indicate that, on average, prospective teachers (N = 70) preferred relevance to uniqueness in student responses. In addition, results of regression analysis indicate that prospective teachers' preference for unique responses varied as a function of grade level and academic subject area. Finally, analysis of written explanations revealed nuanced reasons for prospective teachers' preferences ranging from viewing unique responses as potentially distracting to viewing any response as acceptable because of a desire to encourage student participation. Implications for future research and teacher education are discussed. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students [J].
Aljughaiman, A ;
Mowrer-Reynolds, E .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2005, 39 (01) :17-34
[2]  
Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context: updates to The social psychology of creativity
[3]  
Beghetto R. A, ROEPER REV IN PRESS
[4]   Does Assessment Kill Student Creativity? [J].
Beghetto, Ronald A. .
EDUCATIONAL FORUM, 2005, 69 (03) :254-263
[5]  
Fasko D, 2000, CREATIVITY RES J, V13, P317
[6]  
Feist G J, 1998, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V2, P290, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
[7]  
Florida Richard., 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class
[8]  
Kennedy M.M., 2005, Inside Teaching: How Classroom Life Undermines Reform
[9]  
Nickerson R.S., 1999, HDB CREATIVITY, P392, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.022
[10]   Teaching with and for discussion [J].
Parker, WC ;
Hess, D .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2001, 17 (03) :273-289