Vagus nerve stimulation for essential tremor - A pilot efficacy and safety trial

被引:19
作者
Handforth, A
Ondo, WG
Tatter, S
Mathern, GW
Simpson, RK
Walker, F
Sutton, JP
Hubble, JP
Jankovic, J
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Greater Los angeles Healthcare Syst, Neurol Serv W127, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Calif Neurosci Inst, Oxnard, CA USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.WNL.0000094355.51119.D2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for essential tremor (ET). Methods: This was a pilot open-treatment trial at three centers, with masked videotape tremor assessments. Inclusion required a severity score of 3 or 4 on the Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) in one or both hands. At baseline, tremor was assessed with TRS and Unified Tremor Rating Assessment (UTRA), accelerometry, and a videotape protocol. The VNS device was implanted with leads placed around the left cervical vagus nerve. Stimulation was adjusted over 4 weeks before the repeat tremor assessments. Two raters masked to the study visit scored the videotapes. Results: Nine subjects participated, with a mean age of 65 years and a mean age at onset of tremor of 24. Investigators rated hand tremor as mildly improved (TRS 2.3+/-0.7 during VNS vs 3.0+/-0.4 during baseline, p=0.06). Accelerometry-measured total power improved 50.2+/-31.8% (p<0.01). Videotape tremor scores were highly correlated between the masked raters and revealed no changes in tremor scores with treatment. VNS was well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being stimulation related. Conclusions: VNS was judged by investigators to mildly improve upper extremity tremor. This finding was not confirmed in videotape scoring by masked raters. VNS is not likely to have a clinically meaningful effect on ET.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1405
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
The effect of ethanol on alcohol responsive essential tremor: A positron emission tomography study [J].
Boecker, H ;
Wills, AJ ;
CeballosBaumann, A ;
Samuel, M ;
Thompson, PD ;
Findley, LJ ;
Brooks, DJ .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 39 (05) :650-658
[2]
Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor [J].
Deuschl, G ;
Bain, P ;
Brin, M .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 1998, 13 :2-23
[3]
Fahn S, 1993, PARKINSONS DIS MOVEM, P271
[4]
DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF PATIENTS REQUIRED IN A PRELIMINARY AND A FOLLOW-UP TRIAL OF A NEW CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENT [J].
GEHAN, EA .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1961, 13 (04) :346-&
[5]
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CHRONIC VAGUS NERVE-STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF MEDICALLY INTRACTABLE SEIZURES [J].
GEORGE, R ;
SONNEN, A ;
UPTON, A ;
SALINSKY, M ;
RISTANOVIC, R ;
BERGEN, D ;
MIRZA, W ;
ROSENFELD, W ;
NARITOKU, D ;
MANONESPAILLAT, R ;
BAROLAT, G ;
WILLIS, J ;
STEFAN, H ;
TREIG, T ;
HUFNAGEL, A ;
KUZNIECKY, R ;
UTHMAN, B ;
WILDER, BJ ;
AUGUSTINSSON, L ;
BENMENACHEM, E ;
RAMSAY, E ;
WERNICKE, JF ;
TARVER, WB .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :224-230
[6]
Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures - A randomized active-control trial [J].
Handforth, A ;
DeGiorgio, CM ;
Schachter, SC ;
Uthman, BM ;
Naritoku, DK ;
Tecoma, ES ;
Henry, TR ;
Collins, SD ;
Vaughn, BV ;
Gilmartin, RC ;
Labar, DR ;
Morris, GL ;
Salinsky, MC ;
Osorio, I ;
Ristanovic, RK ;
Labiner, DM ;
Jones, JC ;
Murphy, JV ;
Ney, GC ;
Wheless, JW .
NEUROLOGY, 1998, 51 (01) :48-55
[7]
Handforth A, 2001, MOVEMENT DISORD, V16, P84, DOI 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<84::AID-MDS1010>3.0.CO
[8]
2-S
[9]
VAGAL REPRESENTATION IN CEREBELLUM OF CAT [J].
HENNEMANN, HE ;
RUBIA, FJ .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 375 (02) :119-123
[10]
Acute blood flow changes and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in partial epilepsy [J].
Henry, TR ;
Votaw, JR ;
Pennell, PB ;
Epstein, CM ;
Bakay, RAE ;
Faber, TL ;
Grafton, ST ;
Hoffman, JM .
NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (06) :1166-1173