Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

被引:24622
作者
Tong, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Sainsbury, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Craig, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Sydney SW Area Hlth Serv, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
focus groups; interviews; qualitative research; research design; RANDOMIZED TRIALS; CONSORT STATEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; EXPERIENCES; STANDARDS; MEDICINE; PROPOSAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. Objective. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (indepth interviews and focus groups). Methods. We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Results. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Conclusions. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects. of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 357
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 10 QUEST HELP YOU MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[3]  
Bluff R., 1997, BRIT J MIDWIFERY, V5, P232
[4]  
Blumer Herbert., 1979, CRITIQUES RES SOCIAL
[5]  
Boulton M, 1996, J Eval Clin Pract, V2, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x
[6]  
Cambell R., 2003, Social Science and Medicine, V56, P671
[7]   Evaluating the level of evidence of qualitative research [J].
Cesario, S ;
Morin, K ;
Santa-Donato, A .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2002, 31 (06) :708-714
[8]   Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education [J].
Côté, L ;
Turgeon, J .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (01) :71-75
[9]   A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature [J].
Delaney, A ;
Bagshaw, SM ;
Ferland, A ;
Manns, B ;
Laupland, KB ;
Doig, CJ .
CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (05) :R575-R582
[10]   The problem of appraising qualitative research [J].
Dixon-Woods, M ;
Shaw, RL ;
Agarwal, S ;
Smith, JA .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (03) :223-225