Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

被引:24622
作者
Tong, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Sainsbury, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Craig, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Sydney SW Area Hlth Serv, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
focus groups; interviews; qualitative research; research design; RANDOMIZED TRIALS; CONSORT STATEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; EXPERIENCES; STANDARDS; MEDICINE; PROPOSAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. Objective. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (indepth interviews and focus groups). Methods. We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Results. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Conclusions. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects. of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 357
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Ensuring rigour in qualitative research [J].
Seale, C ;
Silverman, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 7 (04) :379-384
[32]  
Smith LK, 2005, LANCET, V366, P825, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67030-4
[33]   Qualitative research methods [J].
Sofaer, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (04) :329-336
[34]  
Spencer L., 2004, Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence, V2nd
[35]  
*STROBE, STROBE STAT STRENGTH
[36]   Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting [J].
Stroup, DF ;
Berlin, JA ;
Morton, SC ;
Olkin, I ;
Williamson, GD ;
Rennie, D ;
Moher, D ;
Becker, BJ ;
Sipe, TA ;
Thacker, SB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (15) :2008-2012
[37]   Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies [J].
Treloar C. ;
Champness S. ;
Simpson P.L. ;
Higginbotham N. .
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2000, 67 (5) :347-351
[38]   Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research [J].
Walter, FM ;
Emery, J ;
Braithwaite, D ;
Marteau, TM .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (06) :583-594
[39]   Doctors communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study [J].
Wright, EB ;
Holcombe, C ;
Salmon, P .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7444) :864-867