Informing micro insurance contract design to mitigate climate change catastrophe risks using choice experiments

被引:31
作者
Brouwer, Roy [1 ]
Akter, Sonia [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Dept Environm Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] North South Univ, Dept Econ, Dhaka, Bangladesh
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2010年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
catastrophic flooding; choice experiment; climate change; micro insurance; risk behaviour; CROP INSURANCE; PREFERENCE HETEROGENEITY; DEMAND; VALUATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3763/ehaz.2010.SI07
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of this paper is to assess demand for catastrophe insurance in one of the most flood-prone developing countries in the world and to estimate rural household willingness-to-pay for different micro insurance policies to reduce catastrophic flood risks and socio-economic vulnerability. A large-scale rural household survey was conducted targeting more than 1200, heads of households in five different risk-prone districts in Bangladesh located along the three major rivers in the country. All of these areas were severely affected by the catastrophic floods in 2004. Novel in this case study is the design of a stated choice experiment that allows testing of the conditions under which rural household heads favour micro flood insurance. Although hypothetical, this provides important indications of rural household demand for different types of micro flood insurance under different contractual design and provision conditions, such as insurance sum and premium. Besides geographical differentiation, tests were also included for market segmentation based on occupational activities. Most interviewed households are interested in micro flood insurance to protect themselves against the negative impacts of catastrophic floods, especially crop insurance. However, as expected, the affordability of insurance premiums plays an important role.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 88
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study [J].
Provencher, B ;
Bishop, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :793-810
[22]   CROP INSURANCE AND CROP PRODUCTION - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF MORAL HAZARD AND ADVERSE SELECTION [J].
QUIGGIN, J ;
KARAGIANNIS, G ;
STANTON, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 37 (02) :95-113
[23]  
Vandeveer ML, 2001, AGR ECON, V26, P173, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00061.x
[24]  
Wilson A.R., 1991, ENV RISK IDENTIFICAT
[25]  
[No title captured]
[26]  
[No title captured]
[27]  
[No title captured]
[28]  
[No title captured]